On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 11:34:36AM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> thank you for the thorough review.
Seconded!
> > Another issue I see is with connection selection and PPK selection.
> > At the IKE_INTERMEDIATE exchange, we don't know yet which connection
> > this will map to, as we haven't se
Hi Paul,
thank you for the thorough review.
> > some time ago I've posted a new draft "An Alternative Approach for
> > Postquantum Preshared Keys in IKEv2".
>
> > AS you all know we have "Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2"
> > (draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2) draft
> > that is already in Publi
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Valery Smyslov wrote:
some time ago I've posted a new draft "An Alternative Approach for Postquantum
Preshared Keys in IKEv2".
AS you all know we have "Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2"
(draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2) draft
that is already in Publication Requested sta
Hi,
some time ago I've posted a new draft "An Alternative Approach for Postquantum
Preshared Keys in IKEv2".
The draft was presented at IETF106:
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-ipsecme-an-alternative-approach-for-postquantum-preshared-keys-in-ikev2-00)
But it seemed
