Goedendag Paul, ;-)
Thank you for your reply, Valery has also replied to my comments (and I agree
with Valery's reply).
Have a look below for EV>
Regards
-éric
On 10/08/2022, 02:40, "Paul Wouters" wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> ### Section 3 No A
Hello Valery,
Thanks again for the discussion, it should help improving the I-D.
Look below for EV2>
Cheers
-éric
On 09/08/2022, 18:03, "Valery Smyslov" wrote:
Éric, please see my comments below.
For readability I removed some of the stuff we agreed upon.
> Hello Valery,
>
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
### Section 3 No AH
Even if AH is nearly no more used, I wonder whether there is a reason why AH is
not supported by this I-D.
Because we dont wants it :)
RFC 3948 also only defines ESPinUDP and not AHinUDP.
### Section 3
```
Althou
Éric, please see my comments below.
For readability I removed some of the stuff we agreed upon.
> Hello Valery,
>
> Thank you for the prompt reply.
>
> It looks like Erik Kline could be my twin brother as we often emit the same
> comments. FYI, I never read other ADs' ballot to avoid being biase
Hello Valery,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
It looks like Erik Kline could be my twin brother as we often emit the same
comments. FYI, I never read other ADs' ballot to avoid being biased.
I agree with all your replies and explanations except when there is EV>
Regards
-éric
On 09/08/202
Hi Éric,
thank you for your comments. Please see inline.
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https:/
