Hi Tero,
Thanks for the comments. Please find below how I updated the text on my
local copy and let me know if that addresses your concerns.
Yours,
Daniel
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 3:26 PM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Daniel Migault writes:
> >value SN needs to be considered instead. Note that the
Daniel Migault writes:
> value SN needs to be considered instead. Note that the limit of
> messages being sent is primary determined by the security associated
> to the key rather than the SN. The security of the key used to
> encrypt decreases with the each message being sent and a n
