On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Raj Singh wrote:
: > The IKEv2 message id sync is definitely mandatory, but the IPSEC SA seqno
: > sync IMHO isn't. Although, none of this would be an issue if IKEv2 would
: > allow initiator to move the window forward freely (that would be real
: > "fix").
: >
: > The IPsec S
Hi Pekka,
Thanks for your comments. Please find my reply inline.
Best Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Pekka Riikonen wrote:
>
> From the draft:
>
> There were some concerns about the current window sync process. The
> concern was to make IKEv2 window sync optional but we b
