[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 13:47:41 PDT Jon A. Cruz wrote: > I can confirm that much of our low-level approach is upside-down and > would need to be corrected. Such as instead of individual low-level code > spawning new threads to process IO they should expose handles for a > high-level

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, at 09:03 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > In the single-threaded case, our current API takes over the application, > which > means IoTivity can't be added to an existing application: the application > needs to be rewritten instead. To solve this problem, we need a rewrite > o

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201602111742151_N3WZA6X7.png Type: image/png Size: 33527 bytes Desc: not avai

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 10:54:27 PDT Abhishek Sharma wrote: > Hi Thiago > > Only concerns that you have highlighted till now are: > 1) usage of malloc's > 2) event based rather than pull mechanism as used in singlethread. That seems small, but isn't. Those two are mostly what trigg

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Hi Pace Did you just volunteer to produce an IoTivity port to Mynewt? On 8/4/2016 12:12 PM, James Pace wrote: > Thanks to all for this thread: it?s important that constrained devices > are included in the OCF specs and Iotivity. > > > Porting it to different OSes should be possible. We're consi

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Not yet :-) I?m bringing the Apache Mynewt OS to the attention of the community. This obviously just popped up on our radar and no one in the community has stepped forward?yet. I do think that the Apache Mynewt is well-suited to this. thanks, James On Aug 4, 2016, at 9:23, Paul Duffy wrote:

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Not yet :-) I?m bringing the Apache Mynewt OS to the attention of the community. This obviously just popped up on our radar and no one in the community has stepped forward?yet. I do think that the OS is well-suited to this. thanks, James On Aug 4, 2016, at 9:23, Paul Duffy wrote: > Hi Pace

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Thanks to all for this thread: it?s important that constrained devices are included in the OCF specs and Iotivity. > Porting it to different OSes should be possible. We're considering whether to > port to Contiki and/or RIoT, but we have no plans at this moment to do so. We > welcome contributi

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation Along that line: The FAQ you sent was very helpful but an associated "developers kit" type of wiki page with info about what HW has successfully been targeted/build/setup/proven during the poc would

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Thanks to all for this thread: it?s important that constrained devices are included in the OCF specs and Iotivity. > Porting it to different OSes should be possible. We're considering whether to > port to Contiki and/or RIoT, but we have no plans at this moment to do so. We > welcome contributi

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

sts.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev- > bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Thursday, 04 August, 2016 12:22 AM > To: Gregg Reynolds > Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation >

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:29 PM To: Thiago Macieira Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation On Aug 3, 2016 11:45 AM, "Thiago Macieira" mailto:thiago.m

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Thiago wrote: > And that was not even considering the complete design mismatch between a > mainloop-based OS and one that reacts to interrupts. IoTivity's current API > works fine if you're designing a new application from scratch or if you have > threads available. It does not work if you have nei

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Aug 3, 2016 5:22 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 15:04:07 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > ... > > > > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > > > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) p

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 17:28:27 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > Awesome. Please upload asap! Soon. First, we need this discussion to conclude in a consensus that IoTivity wants to have this repository. If IoTivity chooses not to host our code, we'll be disappointed but we'll look for

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 15:04:07 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" > wrote: > ... > > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. > > Can you please clarify how far along it is? S

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: ... > Q: what OSes does it support? > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. Can you please clarify how far along it is? Somewhere else you wrote something that suggested (to me at least) that it wasn't quite comple

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016 12:29 PM > To: Thiago Macieira > Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation > > > > On Aug 3, 2016 11:45 AM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 05:

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Aug 3, 2016 11:45 AM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 05:18:54 PDT ?? wrote: > > Hi Thiago, ... We > need to interoperate with other implementations ... > Nothing says that we need to work on one implementation only. How > many, we get to decide. > I'd go fu

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 12:58:00 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Thiago Macieira < > thiago.macieira at intel.com> > > > This email serves as the official request and the beginning of a > > > discu

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello > > This email serves as the official request and the beginning of a > discussion for > a new Git repository in iotivity.org to contain a new implementation of > the > OCF protocol, designed for constrained devices. > > That's great n

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 14:28:53 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > Nothing says that we need to work on one implementation only. How > > many, we get to decide. > > I'd go further and say that Iotivity should follow the lead of IETF and > make at least two distinct, interoperable, impleme

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 11:22:44 PDT Hudo Assen?o wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > First of all, this looks very promising. Good to see that we have options > for constrained devices. Hello Hudo Happy to be of help. > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (h

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Hi Thiago, First of all, this looks very promising. Good to see that we have options for constrained devices. > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. It can > also be compiled on Linux, but that should be seen as a tool to ease

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 12:58:00 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Thiago Macieira > > This email serves as the official request and the beginning of a > > discussion for > > a new Git repository in iotivity.org to contain a new implementation of > > the > >

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 05:18:54 PDT ?? wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > We have few comments about your constrained implementation feature for > IoTivity. > > 1) Why we require this implementation separately now, when we have IoTivity > base already (both client and server together ) runnin

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201602111742151_N3WZA6X7.png Type: image/png Size: 33527 bytes Desc: not avai

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

Hello This email serves as the official request and the beginning of a discussion for a new Git repository in iotivity.org to contain a new implementation of the OCF protocol, designed for constrained devices. If there are no objections, we'd like to upload the code one week from today. Some