[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-26 Thread 최순황
HTML ?? ??... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501261931007_LLKJ9INH.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: ?? ?? ???

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-22 Thread Tung, Mark Y
, January 22, 2015 3:21 AM To: Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; ??? Cc: ???; Bowden, George; Moses, Jaideep; Agerstam, Mats G; ???; ???; ???; Subramaniam, Ravi; ???; Mirani, Jawid; Tung, Mark Y; ??; ??? Subject: Re: Re: [dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal Hi Thiago, Please

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 22 January 2015 11:20:35 you wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > Please refer to my comments below. Hi June and others Note: I've trimmed the Cc list and moved everyone to BCC. If you haven't subscribed to iotivity-dev, you won't get replies. Subscribe now, please. If you have problems subscr

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-22 Thread 양준용
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501222020464_PYMC4CBB.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: not avai

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-20 Thread Lankswert, Patrick
Uze, No worries and no need to apologize. I took this as a gap both in information and in need. I hope that this information helps now. Bernie, Tim and I are meeting today to close your need. We should have plan including anything that is blocking shortly. Pat -Original Message- From:

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-20 Thread 최우제(Uze Choi)
Hi Pat/Bernie, I didn't intend to claim the android development and sharing status. If you feel like that, please apologize me. >From the release point of view, I'd like to give my opinion that Android >service API also need to be done to align to Android Base API release. Regarding primitive se

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-20 Thread Kourt, Tim A
Hi Uze, You may find the extension of MediaTek's Android work that is currently includes most of the server-client APIs at https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/160 (Work in Progress) I would recommend referring to "android/android_api/base/src/androidTest/java/org/iotivity/base/DevTest.java" an

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-20 Thread Keany, Bernie
Hi Uze, No worries, no need for an apology. Tim Kourt from our team has pushed to the branch that Pat created and is currently preparing an email with a link to the change set. We?d like the feedback of the contributors on this list and there is still a small amount of work to be done before it c

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-19 Thread 최우제(Uze Choi)
Hi Bernie, >From Android Platform porting view, Let me list up related tasks as follows. - Android Base API re-factorization. (Intel - Corresponding Primitive Service Implementation change for Android Base API change. - Android Primitive Service API implementation. Regarding Android Base API

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-19 Thread Lankswert, Patrick
Uze, I *think* that Bernie's folks intend to share by pushing their code for everybody's review in a branch. This will allow anybody and everybody an opportunity to review, make comments/changes and finally agree before committing to master or release branch. There are a number of things that

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-19 Thread Eunice YunHee Hwang
HTML ?? ??... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501190925607_YKENUIXH.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: ?? ?? ???

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-16 Thread Keany, Bernie
Hi Pat .. Thanks for connecting the threads. we?ve completed a significantly refactored Android API implementation that includes OIC Client and Server support, this is based on the code we shared in mid December with Samsung and MediaTek but migrated to M2. We believe we will push the code to a

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-16 Thread Lankswert, Patrick
June, It would be best to take these discussion to the mailing list. Bernie?s team, which was not on this email, had some time and has flushed out the server API for Android. I cannot commit for them, but I think that they are close to done with the implementation. Pat From: JuneYong Young [mai

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-16 Thread JuneYong Young
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501161700168_BEI0XT4N.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: not avai

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
[cutting the rest of the email because my client destroys HTML formatting when replying] Hi June The email that Soonhwang forwarded to the dev mailing list appears to contain a feature list. Has that feature list been documented in the IoTivity JIRA? If not, can I ask that we begin doing that,

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 15 January 2015 07:35:18 SOON HWANG CHOI wrote: > Dear Juneyoung > > We have discussed about QA Criteria for IoTivity V1.0 in today's QA CC. > I attached the result > > Next, in case of test case type , Samsung's test case is a kinds of > API Test Case and Intel's test ca

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

2015-01-15 Thread SOON HWANG CHOI
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501151635155_XOK0LK7C.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: not avai