Re: [dev] [IoTivity-Lite] Zephyr Porting DTLS connection

Hi Jaehyun, Your update fixed the issue that dtls messages are handled in coap not in dtls. Thanks very much. Taehwa -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10048): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/10048 Mute This Topic: h

[dev] [IoTivity-Lite] Zephyr Porting DTLS connection

Hello IoTivity dev! Now I'm working on IoTivity-Lite zephyr porting. The problem is when security option is on, DTLS handshake isn't managed properly. I'm building a OCF server device and if the device gets DTLS client hello, that packet is handed over to coap engine and when checking packet, be

[dev] [IoTivity-Lite] oc_storage_configuration function for Zephyr

Hi! I'm trying to figure out how to use oc_storage_configuration function in Zephyr porting. In comment says following. /** It expects the device name, flash sector size and maximum read/write size separated by comma:                                                    device_name,flash_sector_si

[dev] [IoTivity-Lite] Porting to Zephyr

Hi! I'm trying to port IoTivity-Lite server to zephyr. But, It seems Zephyr project updated and changed a lot compared to the time when IoTivity-Lite port to zephyr code was written. (The current version of Zephyr is 1.13) In Zephyr project, no more make used but cmake. some of configuration name

Re: [dev] [IoTivity-Lite] Question about oc_sec_decode_acl function's behavior calling oc_resource_make_public

6  ( https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9966 ) > > > > > >   > > > > Hi, > > > >   > > > > Having the .octt file will help but the issue you're reporting: > > > >   > > > > For Smart Home Dev

[dev] [IoTivity-Lite] Question about oc_sec_decode_acl function's behavior calling oc_resource_make_public

Hello, iotivity-dev! I'm preparing OCF Certification and I'm doing it using IoTivity-Lite. When I'm testing CT1.1.6 OCF Endpoint the problem occurs. In CT1.1.6, before starting the test, an ACE which grants "anon-clear" access to any Resource that has a CoAP Endpoint  is added. (It looks like fol

[dev] CRUDN permission for SVRs from the devices which is not in the aclist.

[Edited Message Follows] Hello! I'm preparing to OCF certification and testing my server using OCF Conformance Tool(2.2.0). I passed or got warning for almost tests but the only remaining test is the CT1.7.8.11. The process of the test is following(I omitted some process for convenience). 1. F

[dev] CRUDN permission for SVRs from the devices which is not in the aclist.

I'm preparing to OCF certification and testing my server using OCF Conformance Tool(2.2.0). I passed or got warning for almost tests but the only remaining test is the CT1.7.8.11. The process of the test is following(I omitted some process for convenience). 1. Four random UUIDs for DOXS, AMS, CM