ycbor-version.h header
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9930):
https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9930
Mute
ntainer
TL;DR: natural person is selected by the community, ISG ratifies.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#96
as a problem.
If that worked, then run IoTivity's scons from that prompt.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9673)
I do agree too, though I was holding out hope that we wouldn't need a product
like LIFX but instead would geta wealth of choices from manufacturers. So you
pick up a new TV, a coffee machine or router, you get OCF support so you can
use IoTivity to interact with. I hear they're coming...
As for
to create a Go API for IoTivity in the long run, I would
support it. It isn't. I asked specifically and the proposal is to do CoAP
*only*.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:
You recei
tly, we were not able to find a go-coap library which supports TCP and
> DTLS. Only UDP. Thats why our own implementation - in the IoTivity project,
> as we need it for the new cloud based resource directory and account
> server.
Thanks, that's now clear.
I don't think this shou
tory, why it should belong in
IoTivity, who will be responsible for it (that is, who the Maintainer will
be), and propose a proper name for it.
I think I've asked you to explain the goals at least three times and I still
don't get what you're trying to do. Don't write a sh
entation, but who
> knows how it evolves.
If you're not going to implement the OCF protocol, my recommendation is that
you host it elsewhere, like GitHub or GitLab. It would make sense to host the
CoAP protocol code in IoTivity only if it was developed closely with the OCF
implementa
er and implement the OCF protocol, like IoTivity does?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9612):
https://lists.iotivity.o
; this is out of date. https://wiki.iotivity.org/projects_and_functions
We don't have a lead architect at this time.
That should not stop you from posting your proposal and having it discussed.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Ope
oWPAN-based network that the Nest thermostat uses to talk to sensors.
They are different protocols. Nest Weave competes more with Bluetooth LE than
with OCF, at least until we figure out low-power OCF.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Techn
come with a solution to
Ondrej's problems.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/
s
https://github.com/intel/iot-rest-api-server
It's not been updated recently, but it does the work in the direction you
want, so it should get you started.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
g function.
PS: I have a pending task but no time to complete the implementation of
CborEncoder writing to platform-specific chunked buffers.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
following people for
contributing to this release:
Andreas Zisowsky
Konstantin Yegupov
Mårten Nordheim
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 01:19:07 PDT Nadavd wrote:
> Hi Dev
>
> So to answer to Thiago Macieira, my company is not building devices , we
> are building software for different OS devices.
>
> This is why i will not be able to fix the devices we are working on.
Fair eno
Physical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model#Layer_1:_Physical_Layer
Though the OSI model does not map strictly to reality either. Bluetooth is L1
and L2, but the upper half of L2 (MAC) leaks to the layer above (IP) with
IPv6.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Bluetooth GATT. We do some
early support for that in IoTivity, but it's not standardised. The problem of
communication is one, but also because the target type of device where that
would make sense is quite possibly too small to run even IoTivity Constrained.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.ma
oes not require IPv6.
OCF's analog in the HTTP world would be a particular HTTP application or
website. For example, we can say it's the web app that controls my Mitsubishi
air conditioner (Kumocloud). That particular service requires IPv4.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (A
message will work straight after
> starting the iotivity.
It could be simply because IPv6 gets address assignment very quickly
(stateless) whereas IPv4 needs to wait for DHCP. Please confirm that the
network interface had IP addresses assigned before the IoTivity appl
27;t see them only after.
How did you test this? Was it with tcpdump on the local machine? Was that
machine just recently booted? Had it already acquired an address via DHCP?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Monday, 12 March 2018 11:14:24 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 12 March 2018 11:10:29 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> > On Mar 12, 2018 1:04 PM, "Thiago Macieira"
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, 12 March 2018 09:28:54 PDT Nadavd wrote:
> > >
On Monday, 12 March 2018 11:10:29 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2018 1:04 PM, "Thiago Macieira"
> wrote:
> On Monday, 12 March 2018 09:28:54 PDT Nadavd wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I created an environment that my client is configure to do discove
another tool to verify that the packet was sent from the client device.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
as
> they are now while making it possible to use more standard cbor encoding.
Not asking to change what's already there. We were just wondering why it is
the way it is.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
0303030302d303030302d303030302d303030302d3030303030303030303030306a726f776e657275756964782430303030303030302d303030302d303030302d303030302d303030303030303030303030627274816a6f69632e722e646f786d626966816f6f69632e69662e626173656c696e65ff'}
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
end to push them. The
dat files will be updated in this case and the developer may not notice that
they did, as the developer did not intentionally modify those files.
So, please, never modify committed files as part of the build. That's bad
practice.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieir
will know about it and will add "updated .dat files" to the
commit message (if it isn't obvious that it was needed).
No one else needs to see those files being modified. Ever.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software A
t; Cannot be CREATEd, ok, but why can I not DELETE whatever I please?
Sure, go ahead. Send HTTP DELETE commands to random webpages and see what
happens. You'll likely find that you're going to get one of the denied errors
for everything, except for resources that were PUT in the first place.
there any samples that show CREATE and DELETE? Since security
> permissions map directly to the CRUDN I wanted to understand how CRUDN
> actually maps to code.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
__
which one was C and
which one was C++, renaming one or both was the correct solution.
I follow the rule of thumb of always naming things lowercase. Otherwise, you
have to remember if it's "Clipboard" or "ClipBoard".
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.
C++ source files as .C and headers as .H hasn't been done in three
decades...
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev
ipconfig /all" ?
>From your description, it sounds like we included an IPv6 address from an
interface that wasn't active, so the client attempted to connect to it and
failed. It could also be a link-local address coming from the wrong interface.
--
Th
sion of the submodule. But maybe my understanding is
> incorrect...
You are correct. We are just not using this feature.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity
ately, which also can be an github submodule in IOTivity.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Wouter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org
> [mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Thiago
> Macieira Sent: 30 January 2018 22:59
>
-copy
string access API will be provided in the 0.6 release.
The project maintainer would like to thank the following people for
contributing to this release:
Bertrand Roussel
George Nash
Erich Keane
Fabrice Fontaine
Vipul Rahane
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software
ore time to design it properly to work in constrained OSes. Zephyr and myNewt
have been screaming for that.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
On terça-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2018 12:52:41 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Release page: https://github.com/intel/tinycbor/releases/tag/v0.5-beta1
> Downloads
> - https://github.com/intel/tinycbor/archive/v0.5-beta1.zip
> - https://github.com/intel/tinycbor/archive/v0.5-beta1.tar.gz
freestanding C environments.
The project maintainer would like to thank the following people for
contributing to this release:
Bertrand Roussel
Erich Keane
Fabrice Fontaine
Vipul Rahane
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology
I have no clue how to update the link from
https://www.iotivity.org/documentation
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
ot sure that's a valid use-case. It may be that all resources are
discoverable, but access to them may fail to some users.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivi
be done? If so,
> how? Can I do this kind of discover access control by the Access Control
> List?
ACLs may apply at a later stage, after discovery.
You should simply filter the result so hat you find the device you want and
discard the one you don't.
--
Thiago Macieira - thia
after branching, or when
compiling from a tarball (no .git dir).
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotiv
Unfortunately, the problem here is that -Werror was enabled for you. It should
not have been. That's a mistake in IoTivity.
-Werror should only be enabled for project developers.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Arc
ouldn't get an AF_NETLINK socket in the
first place. Some stupid SELinux or Seccomp rules blocked it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailin
#x27;s a difference between technical capability and legal capability.
You may be frustrated, but that does not give you the right to insult the
competency of people without all the facts.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Soft
ystems.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
gger ones, yes, there should be a firewall. But "defense in
depth" comes to mind too :-)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing
equests over 3G. It's a PPP connection, so it won't find any neighbours, but
I don't want those packets going out anyway. Much less accept incoming
packets.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
.
> you DO NOT want to accept OCF packets
>
>
> What would be the point of running iotivity if you don't accept OCF
> packets? I must be missing something here.
You accept packets on the LAN interface. Just not from the Internet. And you
don't send querie
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 14:08:20 PST Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2017 3:58 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>
> ..
>
> 3) integration with the network monitor capabilities, like which interfaces
> to whitelist or to blacklist
>
>
> I've been l
with our crypto library of choice, which now seems to be
mbedTLS, not tinydtls
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivi
ications
you already have installed, hopefully much more complete and more featureful
than what your simple lightbulb controller would be. I don't want to install
your app, plus Samsung Connect for my washing machine plus LG's equivalent for
my TV, etc. One application must suf
y are actually in stores. The date for that depends on each
manufacturer's own marketing and strategy, so something that was certified a
month ago may not show up for 6 months, for example.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Arch
t of information for end users that the device has been tested
to conform to the specification.
Here's what OCF hasn't decided on yet: what happens to things that are pure
software? If I download an application for my router, does the app get a logo?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.maci
ed?
It cannot. You can test it against the Certification Test Tool to give your
users a guarantee that it will pass certification, if they don't mess up and
do write the 20% remaining work.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open
to test on your hardware, with your toolchain.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
.
The communication between your client and the IoTivity server is an OCF
communication. The interaction between the server and the actual device is
irrelevant.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
t; runs on a same system.
>
> In this case, implementing Provisioning and Security is necessary ?
How is it an OCF client if it only talks to non-OCF devices?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
addresses of
the VMs using network address translation (NAT). The IPv6 Internet client
cannot communicate directly with the IPv6 address of the VMs."
If it weren't this tiny detail, Azure's offering was superior to AWS in almost
every way. And the price calculator is a lot easier t
e to host my new server,
both Google Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure were discarded, without looking
at prices]
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev ma
has a major regression related to dynamic initialisation, but it
doesn't show up as warnings. It's good enough for testing, though, so I
recommend using it if you can.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Arc
On quarta-feira, 22 de novembro de 2017 01:21:25 PST Max Kholmyansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to force the IoTivity 1.3.1 based client to perform the
> multicast discovery via IPv4.
Why?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Sourc
migrate to the getters like
cbor_encoder_get_extra_bytes_needed().
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https
r term.
I'll encourage you to participate in contributing the features you want, not
to wait for others.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity
to verify that those techniques aren't
enabled, after the build. The suggestions don't apply to open source software,
where multiple people build the software. They don't have a suggestion on how
to work in Open Source for this matter.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira
f the discussion.
It's also meant to be a live document and we should update it as we learn,
though it's not meant to duplicate what's in the source code itself.
PS: the page isn't linked from anywhere yet. I'd like some feedback and
updates before we make it IoTivit
mentation details that go back via JNI to call
to Android API. Isn't the network monitor doing that?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing lis
s
> crash, hence this email thread.
The C SDK is the core of the Android port, so yes, it's deployed and known to
work on Android.
But if you built the C SDK without the rest of the Android API, all bets are
off.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Archi
nction. OCF specifies which actions to perform on
each resource -- that's the interaction model.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@li
On terça-feira, 31 de outubro de 2017 08:28:32 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote:
> Is there a reason why the "logger" library lives in resource/csdk?
My guess is that it's hysterical raisins. I mean, historical reasons.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software
find out what happened.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
(overhead increases to 2). The simplicity
of representing in JSON was the winning argument, over the 123% increase in
payload.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 06:03:41 PDT Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 03:40, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> > Also note that COSE requires that the protected maps also conform to the
> > canonical format (RFC 7049 section 3.9), but our map doesn't.
>
> Actu
; encoded data. The problem is RFC-7049 does not know when cbor is encoded
> inside cbor and thinks it is just a collection of binary data.
There's a way to mark that a Byte String contains CBOR, but I've never seen it
used in practice. And to be honest, I'm not sure a decoder shou
the
> Pi using Tizen/Yocto, or building natively on the Pi? If the latter,
> what is the environment?
>
> Is it possible to test with the 1.3.1-to-be (that would be the 1.3-rel
> branch from git - sounds like you may have started from the 1.3.0
> release tarball, is that righ
; paste or Find in your error, I am not bothering with
it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.io
Your application needs to filter those out. It's not easy for the client stack
to determine that it's coming from the same process.
We need the ability to loop back to the same host in case there are more
applications running on the same machine.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.maciei
2.0,
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
Or Windows (NT line) versions: 3.0, 3.1, 3.11, 3.51, 4, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8,
8.1, 10.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Cen
e tihs is a problem and should be fixed, possibly even a showstopper
because we'd be sending truncated useless data, we're not actually overflowing
the buffers and causing further security issues.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - In
ve to start the question with the OS you want to run this on. What
constrained / real-time OS is this?
We expect you to be familiar with that OS.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Te
appy to take
them. There was another post last week asking for the same, so you may want to
join forces.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
te
it for future versions.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
r port source code.
> I can file an issue or make a new pull request on github.
>
> Please advise
Correct, because setting up the IP addresses is out of scope. You must do that
in your application.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Op
*ifaddr = net_if_ipv6_addr_add(net_if_get_default(),
> &in6addr_my,
> NET_ADDR_MANUAL, 0);
Thanks. I've now closed the issue.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology
re saying it's present,
but is it present in all commits you're trying to push?
Run git log @{u}.. (including the two dots) to see all commits you're trying
to push.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_
th the qemu application in the case of iotivity constrained. RIOT is
> working fine. I will try to compare how network init is done in http_server
> and then in the iotivity zephyr port to see if the bug can be solved.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Softwar
On quarta-feira, 13 de setembro de 2017 14:19:31 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 09/13/2017 01:23 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quarta-feira, 13 de setembro de 2017 11:57:59 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote:
> >> Is this something to worry about? Can/should we try to improve? If so,
that we're not actively working on.
As far as I know, the only content we've made in the past three years, after
the site was launched, was the release blogs and wiki.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open
ications from performing certain
actions.
The client applications must be onboarded by the same OBT as the devices
themselves.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-
On Thursday, 31 August 2017 01:52:34 PDT Wouter van der Beek (wovander) wrote:
> Well OCF membership is free (at the lowest level)...
Right, but not mandatory for participation in IoTivity. He can choose to not
make himself a member for any number of reasons.
--
Thiago Macie
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 14:57:22 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 13:51:47 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote:
> > iotivity no longer "ships" mbedtls, leaving it to the developer to pull
> > it from the upstream git themselves. however, once they do
people to apply for every one of our
releases. It should be done on top of the latest stable.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@li
just upgrade your Yocto to a release that did have that layer,
then rebuild the board's BSP?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity
loper in IoTivity, he is just wondering what is asked of him and of
other developers in order to write more code to IoTivity.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity
even sure what was used before that, probably autotools/make, but I
> don't know.
It was manually-maintained Makefiles.
The choice to use Scons was made by the developer who volunteered to rewrite
the Makefiles. Since there was no one else volunteering to do the work, we let
the devel
arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-ld --version reports: GNU ld (GNU
> Binutils) 2.24 Copyright 2013
That's not "last two years".
Consider rebuilding your SDK.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Archit
nd which
exhausted your available RAM, then caused the application to crash? After it
crashes, all its memory is deallocated so free will report free memory.
If you are sure you are seeing valid values, then your system's calloc() has a
bug. Is it a recent enough glibc? (as in, last two years)
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 09:36:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> This is not an IoTivity problem. Your device is out of memory.
It could be an IoTivity problem if it's leaking memory.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technolog
m calloc.
This is not an IoTivity problem. Your device is out of memory.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
1 - 100 of 909 matches
Mail list logo
