Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.

2018-04-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 3:01 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote: > Sorry for late response due to mail system filtering. I didn’t ware of it. > > > > I think open source project need to have two most important quality > factors which are extensibility for more usage and maintainability. > > Of course some proj

Re: [dev] Resignation from IoTivity Maintainer role

2018-04-06 Thread Heldt-Sheller, Nathan
Very sorry to hear that Dan; you've been an invaluable contributor and maintainer! Thanks for all your work, Sincerely, Nathan From: iotivity-maintainers-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-maintainers-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mihai (WINDOWS) via Iotivity-mainta

Re: [dev] Resignation from IoTivity Maintainer role

2018-04-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 1:57 PM Daniel Mihai (WINDOWS) via iotivity-dev < iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > My role at Microsoft has been changing, so I have to resign from my > IoTivity Maintainer role. > You could always resign from MS and stick with Iotivity. Just sayi

[dev] Resignation from IoTivity Maintainer role

2018-04-06 Thread Daniel Mihai (WINDOWS) via iotivity-dev
Hi everyone, My role at Microsoft has been changing, so I have to resign from my IoTivity Maintainer role. It has been fun working on IoTivity, and I am grateful for all your help over time! Maybe I will find time to contribute to IoTivity again in the future... Dan __

[dev] iotivity test branch future/positioning

2018-04-06 Thread Mats Wichmann
Just trying to clear some things up... The gerrit page on projects lists test among the other branches: https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/admin/projects/ as I'm not sure if that is a restricted page or not, let me also paste the description here: iotivity-test: A sandbox project for testing

Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.

2018-04-06 Thread Wouter van der Beek (wovander)
Thx! Some thoughts: For IOTIvity-Lite the next consideration should be important: -(static) Code size -Memory/Run size Being currently the smallest OCF code base, it should be ensured that the code/run size does not get inflated. Hence it should have the minimal API to create al

[dev] IoTivity and LoRaWAN

2018-04-06 Thread Roland Kromes
Hy all, I would like to know if there any way to integrate IoTivity with LoRaWAN ? Thanks Best regards, Roland Kromes ___ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.

2018-04-06 Thread Uze Choi
Sorry for late response due to mail system filtering. I didn’t ware of it. I think open source project need to have two most important quality factors which are extensibility for more usage and maintainability. Of course some project could be the optimization is most important. It looks impo

Re: [dev] difference between "Platform ID" and "PIID" ?

2018-04-06 Thread Joo-Chul Kevin Lee
Hi Natan & Dan Thank you for your clarification, however, I'm sorry, I'm still confused.. There could be 2 possible cases I think: case 1) there are multiple OCF devices (of course logical Device; Stack instance) that are using difference protocols (e.g. ethernet and Wifi) in " *A Same Physical D