Gregg
You can find the change history in
https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/architecture_tg/document.php?document_id=10901
along with intermediate versions.
Among them, the main changes are
v0.3r06:
Includes the following BZ integrated for review:
- BZ #1
Just pushed a trivial fix. I can see it right there at
https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/22259.
Can't ask anybody to review it though, because Gerrit, in it's wisdom, asks
me to login with a password:
Sign In to Gerrit Code Review at gerrit.iotivity.org
But I don't have a password. I login
Hi Greg,
Since your concern is purely OCF specific, CTWG or OSWG or SCTG under OSWG
under OCF organization is the right forum to discuss this topic.
Regards
Dwarka
--
Software R&D Center | Software Strategy
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:33 PM, JinHyeock Choi wrote:
> + Mitch Kettrick (CPM)
>
> OCF 1.3.
>
> The difference between OCF 1.0 & 1.3 are mostly about clarification
> with a few additional features (e.g. Easy Setup) &
> the CERT would be based on OCF 1.3
> I ask Mitch, CPM, to correct if I misund
+ Mitch Kettrick (CPM)
OCF 1.3.
The difference between OCF 1.0 & 1.3 are mostly about clarification
with a few additional features (e.g. Easy Setup) &
the CERT would be based on OCF 1.3
I ask Mitch, CPM, to correct if I misunderstand.
JinHyeock
p.s.
Taking 2 month IPR review period into conside
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> OCF 1.0.0 was released on June 27, 2017.
>
> On August 18 2017 - not even 1 month later - a draft for OCF 1.3 was
> released.
>
> Ok, not even 2 months later. ;)
> Which one should I read? Which one does Iotivity plan to support, and
> w
OCF 1.0.0 was released on June 27, 2017.
On August 18 2017 - not even 1 month later - a draft for OCF 1.3 was
released.
Which one should I read? Which one does Iotivity plan to support, and when?
Thanks,
Gregg
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-d
Howdy, Yegor,
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> Hi Gregg,
>
>
>
...
> I'm still trying to understand, what is so wrong with CMake that both
> IoTivity and AllJoyn are using Scons?
>
No idea. All I know is that at some point a switch was made to Scons. I'm
not even su
Which version of libcoap do we want to pursue?
We have a forked copy in resource/csdk/connectivity/lib which is
moderately old. It's named libcoap-4.1.1, but does not match the layout
of the upstream 4.1.1 release bundle - headers have moved to an
include/coap directory in ours, something which
On 29/08/17 10:11, Iosif Hamlatzis wrote:
> After fixing checksums and patches for icedtea7-native/2.1.3-r1.0 the
> image starts compiling but I get a few errors. My host machine
> is Ubuntu 14.04.5 under VirtualBox
>
>
>
>
> | >&2 echo "*** This OS is not supported:" `uname -a`; exit 1;
> | ***
Thanks Mats.
So I am listing here initial thoughts so far from me and Mats -
* Is it well documented in English.?
* What problem does the 3rd party library solve?
* is there any overlap with other parts of the codebase (either another
external lib, or iotivity code itself). If so, why add a new
After fixing checksums and patches for icedtea7-native/2.1.3-r1.0 the image
starts compiling but I get a few errors. My host machine is Ubuntu 14.04.5
under VirtualBox
| >&2 echo "*** This OS is not supported:" `uname -a`; exit 1;
| *** This OS is not supported: Linux iosif-VirtualBox 4.4.0-92-
12 matches
Mail list logo