[dev] [Question] about iotivity 1.3.0 new CoAP options

2017-07-13 Thread 조병탁
Hello   I have question about Accept version & content-format version on iotivity 1.3.0 (OCF 1.0 spec.)   Accept version : CoAP option number 2049 Content-Format Version : CoAP option number 2053   above new option idicate a critical option(Odd number) - CoAP rfc7252.(Not elective opti

Re: [dev] Raspberry pi build error

2017-07-13 Thread Mats Wichmann
your OS info would be more helpful given the type of problem (and autoconf version). and don't worry if you need to turn off unit tests. On July 13, 2017 6:58:42 PM MDT, rami alshafi wrote: >I keep running to this error when building IoTivity (1.3-rel branch >commit 5bebafb64d by George Nash: [

[dev] Raspberry pi build error

2017-07-13 Thread rami alshafi
I keep running to this error when building IoTivity (1.3-rel branch commit 5bebafb64d by George Nash: [IOT-2207]) on the raspberry pi which seems to be related to unit testing. my workaround so far is to skip building unit testing. *** Checking for installation of google unit test %s *** 1.7.0

Re: [dev] Question about hard limits for running IoTivity

2017-07-13 Thread Mats Wichmann
you can poke around a bit at wiki.iotivity.org/hardware, it has other pointers. ocf specs don't have any current provision for really light devices, for what its worth. On July 13, 2017 6:50:57 PM MDT, sunlf wrote: >Hi, Devs, > > > >I'm writing this mail to ensure one question. > > > >To run

[dev] Question about hard limits for running IoTivity

2017-07-13 Thread sunlf
Hi, Devs, I'm writing this mail to ensure one question. To run IoT, is there any hardware limitation? What's the smallest request of FLASH and RAM? Thanks Jason ___ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.i

Re: [dev] [notice] IoTivity Services Outage

2017-07-13 Thread Trevor Bramwell
All, The wiki has been brought back online. This is the last service that was affected by the outage and all IoTivity services should now be fully functional. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:28:52PM -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote: > All, > > We are still working on bringing t

Re: [dev] [notice] IoTivity Services Outage

2017-07-13 Thread Trevor Bramwell
All, We are still working on bringing the wiki back online. No ETA at this time. Will provide another update within 1 hour. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:54:52AM -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote: > All, > > Gerrit and JIRA appear to have recovered, but the wiki is still offli

Re: [dev] [notice] IoTivity Services Outage

2017-07-13 Thread Trevor Bramwell
All, Gerrit and JIRA appear to have recovered, but the wiki is still offline. We are continuing to investigate the issue and will provide you another update within 30 minutes. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:31:44AM -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote: > All, > > We are investigat

[dev] [notice] IoTivity Services Outage

2017-07-13 Thread Trevor Bramwell
All, We are investigating a networking connection issue to the datacenter hosting IoTivity services. Due to this issue the following services are offline: gerrit.iotivity.org, jira.iotivity.org, and wiki.iotivity.org. We will provide you an update within 30 minutes. Regards, Trevor Bramwell si

Re: [dev] New project for approval

2017-07-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2017 01:31:18 PDT Betty Zhao wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > Thank you for clarification. I was a bit confused at the beginning. > > U+ bridge can be a plug-in in the main repository, and it will follow the > licenses of IoTivity. > > So what I should do next is to create

Re: [dev] git.iotivity.org????

2017-07-13 Thread Mats Wichmann
On 07/12/2017 07:03 PM, Max Kholmyansky wrote: > Hi > There is also a copy on Github: > https://github.com/iotivity/iotivity/ > The last update there was also 3 weeks ago. > > *Actually, what is the overhead of maintaining the Github copy up-to-date > state?* > > Github copy may not be very usefu

Re: [dev] git.iotivity.org????

2017-07-13 Thread Philippe Coval
Thanks Joseph, for notifying this, this is annoying but not blocking us as gerrit is still working. Also it looks like jenkins is not fully functional today, I have also forwarded it to jira and helpdesk, Track: https://jira.iotivity.org/browse/IOT-2279 And will try to reach LF on IRC if pro

Re: [dev] New project for approval

2017-07-13 Thread Wouter van der Beek (wovander)
What about the code of the bridge on the U+ slide? Will that have the same licence agreement? I am expecting that the U+ code will be existing open source code somewhere. And the U+ code is being compiled in an client/server as an library or as an link to an src repo that gets compiled during the

Re: [dev] New project for approval

2017-07-13 Thread Betty Zhao
Hi Thiago, Thank you for clarification. I was a bit confused at the beginning. U+ bridge can be a plug-in in the main repository, and it will follow the licenses of IoTivity. So what I should do next is to create a U+ plug-in sub-repository in the main bridging repository, right? Regards, Be