On 13/06/17 17:17, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 08:30 AM, Kevin Kane via iotivity-dev wrote:
>> We've explored splitting the patch into multiple chunks before, and decided
>> it was a bad idea. The only value it appears to add is making the patch
>> files more human-readable, but it com
ollowed by the executable name.
Inside gdb, run these commands:
bt
x/i $pc
Attach the result.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was
We've explored splitting the patch into multiple chunks before, and decided it
was a bad idea. The only value it appears to add is making the patch files more
human-readable, but it complicates the process to create or update the patch
files in order to make a change or update mbedTLS, and then
On ter?a-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 12:08:30 PDT Maalvika Bachani wrote:
> My apologies! Totally forgot to run the following commands.
> Please find the text from various commands pasted below:
>
> (gdb) x/i$pc
> => 0x438354
> <_ZNSt14_Function_base13_Base_managerIPFvSt10shared_ptrIN3OIC7Service17
On 06/13/2017 10:34 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On ter?a-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 08:51:36 PDT C.J. Collier wrote:
>> Dave Thaler's approach to resolve a similar problem for tinycbor was to
>> fork the github repo and apply all pull requests to the fork:
>>
>> https://github.com/dthaler/tinycbor
On ter?a-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 10:38:04 PDT Maalvika Bachani wrote:
> Program terminated with signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> #0 0x00438354 in std::_Function_base::_Base_manager (*)(std::shared_ptr)>::_M_manager(std::_An
> y_data&, std::_Any_data const&, std::_Manager_operation)
On 13/06/17 06:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 12 de junho de 2017 17:34:04 PDT Mats Wichmann wrote:
>> as far as I can see, the push to mbedtls 2.4.2 broke the patch that is
>> applied on top of that repository. I'm seeing 100% of the builders fail
>> now, with these sorts of mess
On ter?a-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 07:30:55 PDT Kevin Kane wrote:
> We've explored splitting the patch into multiple chunks before, and decided
> it was a bad idea. The only value it appears to add is making the patch
> files more human-readable, but it complicates the process to create or
> updat
On ter?a-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 08:51:36 PDT C.J. Collier wrote:
> Dave Thaler's approach to resolve a similar problem for tinycbor was to
> fork the github repo and apply all pull requests to the fork:
>
> https://github.com/dthaler/tinycbor
>
> Can we do this same thing for mbedtls? It wou
On 06/13/2017 08:30 AM, Kevin Kane via iotivity-dev wrote:
> We've explored splitting the patch into multiple chunks before, and decided
> it was a bad idea. The only value it appears to add is making the patch files
> more human-readable, but it complicates the process to create or update the
>
at lists.iotivity.org
> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170613/d74e7b65/attachment.html>
I somehow check what is observable and what not?
Thank you.
Ondrej Tomcik :: KISTLER :: measure, analyze, inovate
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170613/afbfc8d8/attachment.html>
12 matches
Mail list logo