[dev] periodic merge from 1.3-rel into master

2017-04-18 Thread Omar Maabreh
I also don't understand how master could be on a 1.2 base? Not sure exactly what that means... 1.3 was just recently snapped off of master so I those two are already very close (agreeing with Mats here) and then if there were any changes checked into master after 1.3 was snapped then we'd lose t

[dev] IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results

2017-04-18 Thread Malsbary, Todd
t;mailto:dbartolome at at4wireless.com>; '???' mailto:jminl.choi at samsung.com>>; david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com<mailto:david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com>; todd.malsbary at intel.com<mailto:todd.malsbary at intel.com>; wovander at cisco.com<mailto:wovander at cisco.com>; srikguru at microsoft.com<mailto:srikguru at microsoft.com>; '???' mailto:moonki1.hong at samsung.com>>; ed.agis at intel.com<mailto:ed.agis at intel.com>; '???' mailto:daeken.kwon at samsung.com>>; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com<mailto:joseph.l.morrow at intel.com>; '???' mailto:j3s3h3.jin at samsung.com>>; craig at ecaspia.com<mailto:craig at ecaspia.com> Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, 1. It looks like several test cases did not run with an exception thrown failure like this: 1.193s 11:56:13 ERROR:?Exception thrown from python script: Failed to run python script from file "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py" Traceback (most recent ... 1.193s 11:56:13 DEBUG:?continued: ...call last): File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 211, in File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 138, in run File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Security_Common.py", line 25, in add_aces_for_all_resources File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Common.py", line 159, in get_base_links TypeError: iteration over non-sequence of type NoneType Can you look into this please, Jacek? 2. Regarding the issue with the Endpoint test case, can you confirm what the ACL is on the IUT? We are silent on what ACL/ACE to use in this test case and it's possible that this is what is causing the failures. 3. I also noticed that you're exposing IPv6 Endpoints and none of them are accessible. Does the IUT support IPv6? If not, those Endpoints should not be exposed. No sense in spending too much more time on these logs until the first issue is resolved. Mitch From: Ziran Sun [mailto:ziran@samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: i.mushfiq at samsung.com<mailto:i.mushfiq at samsung.com>; cpm at openconnectivity.org<mailto:cpm at openconnectivity.org> Cc: nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com<mailto:nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com>; Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com<mailto:Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com>; vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com<mailto:vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com>; lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org<mailto:lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org>; 'Towhidul Islam'; 'Mark Trayer'; '???'; jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com<mailto:jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com>; '???'; ofer at tekoia.com<mailto:ofer at tekoia.com>; richard.a.bardini at intel.com<mailto:richard.a.bardini at intel.com>; ''; b.scriber at cablelabs.com<mailto:b.scriber at cablelabs.com>; dbartolome at at4wireless.com<mailto:dbartolome at at4wireless.com>; '???'; david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com<mailto:david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com>; todd.malsbary at intel.com<mailto:todd.malsbary at intel.com>; wovander at cisco.com<mailto:wovander at cisco.com>; srikguru at microsoft.com<mailto:srikguru at microsoft.com>; '???'; ed.agis at intel.com<mailto:ed.agis at intel.com>; '???'; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com<mailto:joseph.l.morrow at intel.com>; '???'; craig at ecaspia.com<mailto:craig at ecaspia.com> Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, Just let you know that versioning related patches are not all in yet. They are dependent on a provisioning related patch. We are hoping to have them in ASAP. Best regards, Ziran -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/71c1404e/attachment.html>

[dev] [for 1.3 release] list sharing and update request for some missing blocks

2017-04-18 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/37a83198/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: ?? ?? . URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachment

[dev] Fwd: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11

2017-04-18 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
he can find a volunteer - -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center -- next part -- HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/at

[dev] Interfaces usage

2017-04-18 Thread Gregg Reynolds
et of props based on other criteria, you use resource type, not if. p.s. you have to read the specs, the stuff in oneiota is not enough. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/7d5af0f5/attachment.html>

[dev] Interfaces usage

2017-04-18 Thread Gregg Reynolds
ype, not if. hth, gregg -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/14e39f98/attachment.html>

[dev] Fwd: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11

2017-04-18 Thread Dwarkaprasad Dayama
nter -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/dd72431a/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IoTivity Restructuring Pr

[dev] periodic merge from 1.3-rel into master

2017-04-18 Thread Mats Wichmann
the dev list dropped off this reply, so sending again... although I think Kevin has indirectly answered this question already on cherry picks. On 04/18/2017 10:23 AM, Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 04/18/2017 09:00 AM, Daniel Mihai wrote: >> Thanks Phil! It would be great if you could start running t

[dev] IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results

2017-04-18 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
Kettrick [mailto:c...@openconnectivity.org] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:03 PM To: 'Ziran Sun' ; i.mushfiq at samsung.com; jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com Cc: nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com; Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com; vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com; lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org; 'Towhidul Islam' ; 'Mark Trayer' ; '???' ; '???' ; ofer at tekoia.com; richard.a.bardini at intel.com; '' ; b.scriber at cablelabs.com; dbartolome at at4wireless.com; '???' ; david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com; todd.malsbary at intel.com; wovander at cisco.com; srikguru at microsoft.com; '???' ; ed.agis at intel.com; '???' ; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com; '???' ; craig at ecaspia.com Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, 1. It looks like several test cases did not run with an exception thrown failure like this: 1.193s 11:56:13 ERROR:?Exception thrown from python script: Failed to run python script from file "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py" Traceback (most recent ... 1.193s 11:56:13 DEBUG:?continued: ...call last): File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 211, in File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 138, in run File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Security_Common.py", line 25, in add_aces_for_all_resources File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Common.py", line 159, in get_base_links TypeError: iteration over non-sequence of type NoneType Can you look into this please, Jacek? 2. Regarding the issue with the Endpoint test case, can you confirm what the ACL is on the IUT? We are silent on what ACL/ACE to use in this test case and it's possible that this is what is causing the failures. 3. I also noticed that you're exposing IPv6 Endpoints and none of them are accessible. Does the IUT support IPv6? If not, those Endpoints should not be exposed. No sense in spending too much more time on these logs until the first issue is resolved. Mitch From: Ziran Sun [mailto:ziran@samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: i.mushfiq at samsung.com; cpm at openconnectivity.org Cc: nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com; Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com; vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com; lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org; 'Towhidul Islam'; 'Mark Trayer'; '???'; jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com; '???'; ofer at tekoia.com; richard.a.bardini at intel.com; ''; b.scriber at cablelabs.com; dbartolome at at4wireless.com; '???'; david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com; todd.malsbary at intel.com; wovander at cisco.com; srikguru at microsoft.com; '???'; ed.agis at intel.com; '???'; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com; '???'; craig at ecaspia.com Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, Just let you know that versioning related patches are not all in yet. They are dependent on a provisioning related patch. We are hoping to have them in ASAP. Best regards, Ziran -- next part -- HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/6a832a81/attachment.html>

[dev] [for 1.3 release] list sharing and update request for some missing blocks

2017-04-18 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
oud project 70% In progress - Done JK JK not yet Generic Java Binding 90% merged N/A Done IoTivity QA Rick not yet BR, Uze Choi -- next part -- HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/a4f295f7/attachment.html>

[dev] IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results

2017-04-18 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
Hello, Regarding discovery logic, are there any other contributor? This problem prevent next step continue. We cannot take any progress due to this blocker. BR, Uze Choi From: ??? (Uze Choi) [mailto:uzc...@samsung.com] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 3:55 PM To: Habib Virji (habib.virji at sams

[dev] [for 1.3 release] list sharing and update request for some missing blocks

2017-04-18 Thread 란디프
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/07e67d69/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: not availab

[dev] IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results

2017-04-18 Thread Jacek Hryszkiewicz
intel.com> ; wovander at cisco.com <mailto:wovander at cisco.com> ; srikguru at microsoft.com <mailto:srikguru at microsoft.com> ; '???' mailto:moonki1.hong at samsung.com> >; ed.agis at intel.com <mailto:ed.agis at intel.com> ; '???' mailto:daeken.kwon at samsung.com> >; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com <mailto:joseph.l.morrow at intel.com> ; '???' mailto:j3s3h3.jin at samsung.com> >; craig at ecaspia.com <mailto:craig at ecaspia.com> Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, 1. It looks like several test cases did not run with an exception thrown failure like this: 1.193s 11:56:13 ERROR:?Exception thrown from python script: Failed to run python script from file "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py" Traceback (most recent ... 1.193s 11:56:13 DEBUG:?continued: ...call last): File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 211, in File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCases\Resource_CT1_2_6.py", line 138, in run File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Security_Common.py", line 25, in add_aces_for_all_resources File "C:\Program Files (x86)\OCF Certification Test Tool\Configuration\OCF\TestCasesUtils\CT_Common.py", line 159, in get_base_links TypeError: iteration over non-sequence of type NoneType Can you look into this please, Jacek? 2. Regarding the issue with the Endpoint test case, can you confirm what the ACL is on the IUT? We are silent on what ACL/ACE to use in this test case and it's possible that this is what is causing the failures. 3. I also noticed that you're exposing IPv6 Endpoints and none of them are accessible. Does the IUT support IPv6? If not, those Endpoints should not be exposed. No sense in spending too much more time on these logs until the first issue is resolved. Mitch From: Ziran Sun [mailto:ziran@samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: i.mushfiq at samsung.com <mailto:i.mushfiq at samsung.com> ; cpm at openconnectivity.org <mailto:cpm at openconnectivity.org> Cc: nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com <mailto:nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com> ; Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com <mailto:Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com> ; vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com <mailto:vkandalla at graniteriverlabs.com> ; lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org <mailto:lab_mgr at openconnectivity.org> ; 'Towhidul Islam'; 'Mark Trayer'; '???'; jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com <mailto:jacek.hryszkiewicz at comarch.com> ; '???'; ofer at tekoia.com <mailto:ofer at tekoia.com> ; richard.a.bardini at intel.com <mailto:richard.a.bardini at intel.com> ; ''; b.scriber at cablelabs.com <mailto:b.scriber at cablelabs.com> ; dbartolome at at4wireless.com <mailto:dbartolome at at4wireless.com> ; '???'; david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com <mailto:david.r.kaufman at honeywell.com> ; todd.malsbary at intel.com <mailto:todd.malsbary at intel.com> ; wovander at cisco.com <mailto:wovander at cisco.com> ; srikguru at microsoft.com <mailto:srikguru at microsoft.com> ; '???'; ed.agis at intel.com <mailto:ed.agis at intel.com> ; '???'; joseph.l.morrow at intel.com <mailto:joseph.l.morrow at intel.com> ; '???'; craig at ecaspia.com <mailto:craig at ecaspia.com> Subject: RE: IoTivity 1.3-rel vs CTT 1.5.4 - Test Results Hi, Just let you know that versioning related patches are not all in yet. They are dependent on a provisioning related patch. We are hoping to have them in ASAP. Best regards, Ziran -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/57678850/attachment.html>

[dev] [for 1.3 release] list sharing and update request for some missing blocks

2017-04-18 Thread Muhammad Mushfiqul Islam
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/9570f62b/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: not availab