[dev] IoTivity build failure on master branch

2017-02-01 Thread Nash, George
ipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/505c0805/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/505c0805/attachment.gif>

[dev] Default .dat file

2017-02-01 Thread Malsbary, Todd
--- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/427ec589/attachment.html>

[dev] IoTivity build failure on master branch

2017-02-01 Thread Philippe Coval
ipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/a61f2d0a/attachment.html>

[dev] IoTivity build failure on master branch

2017-02-01 Thread Shetty, Mandeep
qul Islam Antu [cid:image001.gif at 01D27C60.E90FB0F0] [Image removed by sender.] -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/b63a987e/attachment.html> -- next part -

[dev] [OCF1.0 feature merge request] RE: [Ziran, Todd, Sri, MJ, Nathan] [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status

2017-02-01 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
amsung.com> m.trayer at samsung.com>; 'Kesavan, Vijay S' < <mailto:vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com> vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com> Subject: RE: [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status Hi Dwarka, Introspection patch is currently undergoing code revie

[dev] Memory Footprint

2017-02-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 2 de fevereiro de 2017 00:13:05 PST Matta Jayaram wrote: > Dear Jaehong, > > Just a small additional information to previous Thiago response, Hello Matta Those are great numbers. Just one question: your values from "size", are they just IoTivity or are they IoTivity and the

[dev] [OCF1.0 feature merge request] RE: [Ziran, Todd, Sri, MJ, Nathan] [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status

2017-02-01 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
savan at intel.com> Subject: RE: [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status Hi Dwarka, Introspection patch is currently undergoing code review. I am addressing the feedback I received so far and will submit another patch this week. Thanks, Sri From: Ziran Sun [ <mailto:ziran.sun at samsung.com> mailto:ziran@samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 5:24 AM To: 'Dwarkaprasad Dayama' < <mailto:dwarka.dayama at samsung.com> dwarka.dayama at samsung.com>; Habib Virji < <mailto:habib.virji at samsung.com> habib.virji at samsung.com>; '???' < <mailto:myeong.jeong at samsung.com> myeong.jeong at samsung.com>; 'Malsbary, Todd' < <mailto:todd.malsbary at intel.com> todd.malsbary at intel.com>; Dino Natucci < <mailto:Dino.Natucci at microsoft.com> Dino.Natucci at microsoft.com>; 'Morrow, Joseph L' < <mailto:joseph.l.morrow at intel.com> joseph.l.morrow at intel.com>; <mailto:mandeep.shetty at intel.com> mandeep.shetty at intel.com; Srikrishna Gurugubelli < <mailto:srikguru at microsoft.com> srikguru at microsoft.com> Cc: '???' < <mailto:uzchoi at samsung.com> uzchoi at samsung.com>; 'Heldt-Sheller, Nathan' < <mailto:nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com> nathan.heldt-sheller at intel.com>; <mailto:soohong.park at samsung.com> soohong.park at samsung.com; <mailto:moonki1.hong at samsung.com> moonki1.hong at samsung.com; <mailto:jinchoe at samsung.com> jinchoe at samsung.com; 'Mark Trayer' < <mailto:m.trayer at samsung.com> m.trayer at samsung.com>; 'Kesavan, Vijay S' < <mailto:vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com> vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com> Subject: RE: [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status Hi Dwarka, For versioning, around 70% functionalities are done and I?m hope the rest will be done next week. After that I will put it in code review. Best regards, Ziran From: Dwarkaprasad Dayama [ <mailto:dwarka.dayama at samsung.com> mailto:dwarka.day...@samsung.com] Sent: 05 January 2017 05:42 To: Habib Virji; 'Ziran Sun'; ???; 'Malsbary, Todd'; 'Dino Natucci'; Morrow, Joseph L; <mailto:mandeep.shetty at intel.com> mandeep.shetty at intel.com; 'Srikrishna Gurugubelli' Cc: ???; Heldt-Sheller, Nathan; <mailto:soohong.park at samsung.com> soohong.park at samsung.com; <mailto:moonki1.hong at samsung.com> moonki1.hong at samsung.com; <mailto:jinchoe at samsung.com> jinchoe at samsung.com; Mark Trayer; Kesavan, Vijay S Subject: [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status Hi OCF 1.0 Contributors, Wish you all a very Happy & Properous New Year ! OSWG-SCTG is supposed to present status for ongoing work related to OCF 1.0 features. It will be helpful to know where are we now for each of following Big 4 items. - Introspection - Endpoint Information - Versioning - AllJoyn Bridge Application Apart from this, it will also be good to know who all will be present at F2F. As I am not traveling and will be joining relevant sessions through WebEx. Regards Dwarka -- Software R&D Center | Software Strategy Team | Open Source Group Open Connectivity Foundation ? OSWG ? Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering Group ? Advisory Committee -- next part -- HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/a102784c/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: ?? ?? . URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/a102784c/attachment.gif>

[dev] [Next release Schedule update] RE: Feature list request for Upcomming IoTivity release.

2017-02-01 Thread 최우제 (Uze Choi)
ivity.org/2.0_release_plan and register into jira(some items are already done) BR, Uze Choi -- next part -- HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/f87d2fd9/attachment.html>

[dev] [agl-discussions] CES / automotive

2017-02-01 Thread Changhyeok Bae
> >> UK: G/26/2 G02 Building 523, Engineering Centre, Gaydon, Warwick, CV35 ORR >> US: 1419 NW 14th Ave, Portland, OR 97209 >> jaguar.com | landrover.com >> --- >> Business Details: >> Jaguar Land Rover Limited >> Registered Office: Abbey

[dev] Memory Footprint

2017-02-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em quarta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2017, ?s 06:24:54 PST, Jaehong, Jo escreveu: > Hi, Thiago. > > Do you have material about memory footprint using IoTivity Constrained? > How can I measure it on Zephyr? Hello Jaehong Since the Constrained FW does not allocate memory dynamically (no malloc), y

[dev] SW requirement document for RI (/resource/stack)

2017-02-01 Thread 김영진
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/90dcb9ce/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: not availab

[dev] IoTivity build failure on master branch

2017-02-01 Thread Muhammad Mushfiqul Islam
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/953a34f4/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 13402 bytes Desc: not availab

[dev] Memory Footprint

2017-02-01 Thread Jaehong, Jo
HTML ?? ??... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/f81ff007/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ?? ?? . Type: image/gif Size: 13402 byte

[dev] [agl-discussions] CES / automotive

2017-02-01 Thread 이원석
Absolutely I can also concur! Sanjeev had done the great work for CES Demos! I felt he did cover all of positions for the demos from development with more than five companies as well as curation for the press video. It was awesome! :-) Kind regards, Wonsuk. > -Original Message- > From:

[dev] [OCF1.0 feature merge request] RE: [Ziran, Todd, Sri, MJ, Nathan] [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status

2017-02-01 Thread Agis, Ed
jay.s.kesavan at intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Follow Up] OCF 1.0 implementation status Hi Dwarka, Introspection patch is currently undergoing code review. I am addressing the feedback I received so far and will submit another patch this week. Thanks, Sri From: Ziran Sun [mailto:ziran

[dev] Default .dat file

2017-02-01 Thread Daniel Mihai
ile. Is this the expected behavior? Am I missing any additional APIs to setup the .dat file suitable for ownership transfer and provisioning? Thanks, -Todd -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev

[dev] Default .dat file

2017-02-01 Thread Morrow, Joseph L
part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170201/3b322944/attachment.html>

[dev] Default .dat file

2017-02-01 Thread Malsbary, Todd
ity-dev/attachments/20170201/0f2f0c13/attachment.html>