[dev] Android application for simulator or RPI.

2016-08-11 Thread Prakash Ks
pointers please let me know. -- With Regards Prakash K S 9743167347 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/11d4334f/attachment.html>

[dev] Endpoint 0.3 spec ready

2016-08-11 Thread Gregg Reynolds
t; > JinHyeock > > > ___ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/b0cd884e/attachment.html>

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 13:47:41 PDT Jon A. Cruz wrote: > I can confirm that much of our low-level approach is upside-down and > would need to be corrected. Such as instead of individual low-level code > spawning new threads to process IO they should expose handles for a > high-level

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread Jon A. Cruz
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, at 09:03 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > In the single-threaded case, our current API takes over the application, > which > means IoTivity can't be added to an existing application: the application > needs to be rewritten instead. To solve this problem, we need a rewrite > o

[dev] Need maintainer to approve changes related to TinyCBOR

2016-08-11 Thread Jon A. Cruz
Looks like you're all set now. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016, at 01:19 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/9285 > > We need a maintainer to give the +2 to that changes, despite the Jenkins > failure. Jenkins can't pass until we update the CI and the CI can't be > updated > unt

[dev] Regarding BT (BREDR) support for Linux

2016-08-11 Thread Anupam Roy
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/efd2c3f4/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201602111742151_N3WZA6X7.png Type: image/png Size: 33527 bytes Des

[dev] Problems with the OcPlatform.OnPresenceListener Java interface

2016-08-11 Thread Iovene, Salvatore
Hi, bumping up this thread because this is still a problem for me. Anyone? On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Iovene, Salvatore wrote: > Just to expand after some investigation, this is wrong also in C++. > The culprit seems to be the subscribePresenceCallback function in > resource/src/InProcCl

[dev] Problem Get Attributes Android IoTivity

2016-08-11 Thread EZAYEN Salim
5* *esprit*? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/138d51ae/attachment.html>

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread Abhishek Sharma
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/0270a4b6/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201602111742151_N3WZA6X7.png Type: image/png Size: 33527 bytes Des

[dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 10:54:27 PDT Abhishek Sharma wrote: > Hi Thiago > > Only concerns that you have highlighted till now are: > 1) usage of malloc's > 2) event based rather than pull mechanism as used in singlethread. That seems small, but isn't. Those two are mostly what trigg

[dev] FW: FW: Re: FW: Re: Re: Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread 아쇽
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160811/3a809c0f/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201602111742151_N3WZA6X7.png Type: image/png Size: 33527 bytes Des

[dev] FW: FW: Re: FW: Re: Re: Requesting repository for constrained implementation

2016-08-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 07:06:53 PDT ?? wrote: > Hi Thiago.. > > Sorry for my late reply .. > > I think decision need to be taken by all ocf/iotivity stake holders not > alone.. Hello Ashok All stakeholders have had over a week to reply. All the replies, aside from yours, have be