[dev] Heterogeneous arrays

2016-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em segunda-feira, 6 de junho de 2016, ?s 16:18:23 PDT, Malsbary, Todd escreveu: > Hello, > > Does IoTivity support heterogeneous arrays? It looks like the underlying > support is there in tinycbor, but I can't find it exposed through the > OCPayload family of functions. That is correct: we didn

[dev] assigning reviewers

2016-06-06 Thread Bell, Richard S
The wiki one that has the list of project... Thanks, -Rick -Original Message- From: Macieira, Thiago Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 9:38 AM To: Bell, Richard S Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] assigning reviewers Em segunda-feira, 6 de junho de 2016, ?s 08:39:00 PD

[dev] bug in bt_le_adapter?

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/30934d65/attachment.html>

[dev] Error using CSDK logger in objective-C

2016-06-06 Thread Nash, George
The changes needed to actually make this change work are bigger than my first pass change actually suspected. I continued to make changes upto the point that I had actually changed **** lines of code! After that I would have to manually track down the individual lines of code that evaded the sc

[dev] [feature request] merging secure/non-secure IoTivity build binaries

2016-06-06 Thread Junghyun Oh
t; https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/aff2be8c/attachment.html>

[dev] documentation: submission, comment, response

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
ugh I like text I think a screencast would be better in this case. Thanks, Gregg -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/6b172d1c/attachment.html>

[dev] Heterogeneous arrays

2016-06-06 Thread Malsbary, Todd
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/15bde0b1/attachment.html>

[dev] responding to comments

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
g some point is to update a new changeset > but then go back to the prior revision and reply to the individual comments > with "Done" for points that have been addressed. > Thanks, G -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/7dded02b/attachment.html>

[dev] libchibi

2016-06-06 Thread Light, John J
- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/6dca5452/attachment.html>

[dev] responding to comments

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/34833319/attachment.html>

[dev] responding to comments

2016-06-06 Thread Jon A. Cruz
bbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/f160c863/attachment.html>

[dev] assigning reviewers

2016-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em segunda-feira, 6 de junho de 2016, ?s 08:39:00 PDT, Bell, Richard S escreveu: > Thiago, > Who maintains this webpage? > I want to update it and add the UPnP-Bridge Project... Which page? The wiki one? Just go ahead and edit it. If you meant the Gerrit groups, that would be Trevor via the help

[dev] libchibi

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/765d6aeb/attachment.html>

[dev] assigning reviewers

2016-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em segunda-feira, 6 de junho de 2016, ?s 06:41:23 CDT, Gregg Reynolds escreveu: > Hi list, > > I've got a dozen or so minor fixes ready for review. Some of them > eliminate warnings, a couple count as bug fixes, and some are part of the > Darwin port. > > Do I really just pick reviewers at rand

[dev] assigning reviewers

2016-06-06 Thread Gregg Reynolds
to go on. Also how many reviewers to pick? Is one sufficient for small changes? Thanks, Gregg -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/d3d32780/attachment.html>

[dev] [security_wg] RE: [feature request] merging secure/non-secure IoTivity build binaries

2016-06-06 Thread Maloor, Kishen
Hi Nathan, Just my 2 cents, but I feel like this discussion may have gotten more complex than it needs to be. In my opinion, it isn't really about secure vs non-secure binaries. I think the essence of Uze?s request really boils down to supporting secured and ?public? resources at the same time (a

[dev] [security_wg] RE: [feature request] merging secure/non-secure IoTivity build binaries

2016-06-06 Thread Clark, Steve
h non-secure resource. If this is configurable by API or both support by default, it will be very easy to distribute iotivity binary. Moreover, current separate build scheme cannot support the use case that connects both resources one is secure resource and the other is non-secure resource. e.g) An application read the temperature resource (public resource) and personal information storage resource together. Please evaluate this requirement from maintainer perspective. If feasible, I?ll issue the jira ticket for this thing. BR, Uze Choi -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160606/0306e1b4/attachment.html>