[dev] Gerrit submit config changed to "cherry-pick"

On Tuesday 20 January 2015 18:52:38 Dieter, William R wrote: > So, in return for linear history, the maintainer(s) now have to click > "Submit" in the right order on dependent changes. If they do not, the > changes will be submitted in the wrong order, the build will break, and a > sequence of inv

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

Uze, No worries and no need to apologize. I took this as a gap both in information and in need. I hope that this information helps now. Bernie, Tim and I are meeting today to close your need. We should have plan including anything that is blocking shortly. Pat -Original Message- From:

[dev] Gerrit submit config changed to "cherry-pick"

Hello all If you're pushing multiple changes, please read this. If you're always pushing one single change, you can ignore it for now. I've asked sysadmins to change the Gerrit submit configuration to "cherry- pick". If you have multiple commits with dependencies on one another, you need to sub

[dev] [Question] CA Feature Merge Releated

ext.samsung.net/mailcheck/SeenTimeChecker?do=b65f9d91e1020aefa5f44b78ec053a691f495f10576551ceed81201521b94ff84e60fcf6aeb61df594c3b6ddffd7613bcb238d00164b0be48eeb9bec5ad9c75d326bbdfb2ea96a2fcf878f9a26ce15a0] -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150120/5b9da7f3/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text

[dev] IoTivity License Type

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150120/b586f5b4/attachment.html>

[dev] IoTivity License Type

Hi all, what is the exact license type of IoTivity? I have been looking throught code repo and docs, and I can not find it. Best regards, Drasko

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

Hi Pat/Bernie, I didn't intend to claim the android development and sharing status. If you feel like that, please apologize me. >From the release point of view, I'd like to give my opinion that Android >service API also need to be done to align to Android Base API release. Regarding primitive se

[dev] [Question] CA Feature Merge Releated

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150120/12d87251/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201501201647462_Z5JE7EUA.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Des

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

Hi Uze, You may find the extension of MediaTek's Android work that is currently includes most of the server-client APIs at https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/160 (Work in Progress) I would recommend referring to "android/android_api/base/src/androidTest/java/org/iotivity/base/DevTest.java" an

[dev] IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

Hi Uze, No worries, no need for an apology. Tim Kourt from our team has pushed to the branch that Pat created and is currently preparing an email with a link to the change set. We?d like the feedback of the contributors on this list and there is still a small amount of work to be done before it c

[dev] Bachelor thesis call for ideas/discussion

lt;http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150120/70319825/attachment.html>

[dev] GitHub mirror

Thanks a lot! On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Looks like there should be no problem. The sysadmins will set it up and I'll > let you know when it's done, so you can update your repo to be a fork of the > official. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com