Re: [ioquake3] changed com_maxfps behaviour

2011-02-20 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Thanks everyone for your answers, I'll just answer this mail, because it contains everything that has been said. On 20/02/2011 11:50, Thilo Schulz wrote: > On Sunday, 20. February 2011 02:51:01 Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> This was expected that some users will experience that problem. What is >>> y

Re: [ioquake3] changed com_maxfps behaviour

2011-02-20 Thread Thilo Schulz
On Sunday, 20. February 2011 06:57:26 M. Kristall wrote: > Thilo meant your kernel Hz. You should be able to hit 125fps with > kern.hz = 1000, which looks like the default since FreeBSD 6. Yes. -- Thilo Schulz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [ioquake3] changed com_maxfps behaviour

2011-02-20 Thread Thilo Schulz
On Sunday, 20. February 2011 02:59:50 Daniel Gibson wrote: > GEM and KMS are coming to FreeBSD, see > http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/news/freebsd-foundation-announces-new-project > Of course this doesn't help right now. Graphics drivers do not play a part in this. > Maybe Thilo or somebody else know

Re: [ioquake3] changed com_maxfps behaviour

2011-02-20 Thread Thilo Schulz
On Sunday, 20. February 2011 02:51:01 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > This was expected that some users will experience that problem. What is > > your operating system and distribution? And most importantly: what is > > your system Hz setting if there exists something like this? > > Operating system: F