Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 6cc11d2a1759275b856e464265823d94aabd5eaf

2022-07-02 Thread Roman Gushchin
#x27;register_shrinker' might be a candidate > for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] > mm/vmscan.c:702:9: warning: function 'register_shrinker' might be a candidate > for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: mm: reserve hugetlb CMA after numa_init

2020-06-02 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 02:42:30PM +1200, Barry Song wrote: > hugetlb_cma_reserve() is called at the wrong place. numa_init has not been > done yet. so all reserved memory will be located at node0. > > Cc: Roman Gushchin > Signed-off-by: Barry Song Acked-by: Roman Gu

kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2613!

2020-06-18 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
x27;t been changed from 5.7. I do not see any suspicious commits around the call side either. I've tried the following patch: -- >From 4af38fbf06a9354fadf22a78f1a42dfbb24fbc3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roman Gushchin Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:33:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] iommu/dma

Re: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2613!

2020-06-18 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 05:46:24PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:19 PM Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I was consistently hitting a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() in split_huge_page_to_list() > > when running vanilla 5.8-rc1 on my deskto

Re: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2613!

2020-06-19 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:40:26PM -0400, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:14:49PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > I agree. The whole > > > > page = alloc_pages_node(nid, alloc_flags, order); > > if (!page) > >

Re: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2613!

2020-06-19 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:56:28PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > [ 40.287524] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: > > a77b833df000 > > [ 40.287529] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/33] Separate struct slab from struct page

2021-12-14 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
t; range diff: Hi Vlastimil! I've started to review this patchset (btw, a really nice work, I like the resulting code way more). Because I'm looking at v3 and I don't have the whole v2 in my mailbox, here is what I've now: * mm: add virt_to_folio() and folio_address() Reviewed-by

Re: [PATCH v2 00/33] Separate struct slab from struct page

2021-12-15 Thread Roman Gushchin via iommu
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:03:12PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 01:57:22PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 12/1/21 19:14, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > Folks from non-slab subsystems are Cc'd only to patches affecting them, > >