On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:49:40AM -0800, Jianxiong Gao wrote:
> > Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed
> > in time for the 5.12 merge window?
> >
> Tested and it looks good. Thanks for clearing it up!
Let me put it on my regression bucket as last time it was able
> Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed
> in time for the 5.12 merge window?
>
Tested and it looks good. Thanks for clearing it up!
Gao
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed
> in time for the 5.12 merge window?
No objection from me, my ack is already on the patch that you need it
for :)
thanks,
greg k-h
__
Hi all,
this series make NVMe happy when running with swiotlb. This caters
towards to completely broken NVMe controllers that ignore the
specification (hello to the biggest cloud provider on the planet!),
to crappy SOC that have addressing limitations, or "secure"
virtualization that force bounce