Re: preserve DMA offsets when using swiotlb v2

2021-02-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:49:40AM -0800, Jianxiong Gao wrote: > > Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed > > in time for the 5.12 merge window? > > > Tested and it looks good. Thanks for clearing it up! Let me put it on my regression bucket as last time it was able

Re: preserve DMA offsets when using swiotlb v2

2021-02-09 Thread Jianxiong Gao via iommu
> Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed > in time for the 5.12 merge window? > Tested and it looks good. Thanks for clearing it up! Gao ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.

Re: preserve DMA offsets when using swiotlb v2

2021-02-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sorry for being a little pushy, any chance we could get this reviewed > in time for the 5.12 merge window? No objection from me, my ack is already on the patch that you need it for :) thanks, greg k-h __

preserve DMA offsets when using swiotlb v2

2021-02-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi all, this series make NVMe happy when running with swiotlb. This caters towards to completely broken NVMe controllers that ignore the specification (hello to the biggest cloud provider on the planet!), to crappy SOC that have addressing limitations, or "secure" virtualization that force bounce