On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:42:12AM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> dmapool originally tried to support pools without a device because
> dma_alloc_coherent() supports allocations without a device. But nobody
> ended up using dma pools without a device, so the current checks in
> dmapool.c for pool->
On 11/12/18 11:32 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 12/11/2018 15:42, Tony Battersby wrote:
>> dmapool originally tried to support pools without a device because
>> dma_alloc_coherent() supports allocations without a device. But nobody
>> ended up using dma pools without a device, so the current checks i
On 12/11/2018 15:42, Tony Battersby wrote:
dmapool originally tried to support pools without a device because
dma_alloc_coherent() supports allocations without a device. But nobody
ended up using dma pools without a device, so the current checks in
dmapool.c for pool->dev == NULL are both insuff
