RE: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-17 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
ieral...@arm.com; > j...@8bytes.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; w...@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang > ; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) > ; steven.pr...@arm.com; sami.muja...@arm.com; > j...@solid-run.com; yangyicong > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > Hi

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-15 Thread Eric Auger
Hi Shameer, On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > Hi, > > Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which > addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], > this series now make use of it. > > The pull request for ACPICA E.d related changes are already > raised an

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-14 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:43:51AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 11:37, Eric Auger wrote: > > > > Hi Robin > > > > On 3/11/22 11:34 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2022-03-11 08:19, Eric Auger wrote: > > >> Hi guys, > > >> > > >> On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-14 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 11:37, Eric Auger wrote: > > Hi Robin > > On 3/11/22 11:34 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 2022-03-11 08:19, Eric Auger wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) wh

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-14 Thread Eric Auger
Hi Robin On 3/11/22 11:34 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2022-03-11 08:19, Eric Auger wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which >>> addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], >>>

RE: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-11 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
ieral...@arm.com; > j...@8bytes.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; w...@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang > ; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) > ; steven.pr...@arm.com; sami.muja...@arm.com; > j...@solid-run.com; yangyicong > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > Hi Shameer,

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-11 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2022-03-11 08:19, Eric Auger wrote: Hi guys, On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: Hi, Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], this series now make use of it. The pull request for ACPICA E.d related cha

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-11 Thread Eric Auger
Hi guys, On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > Hi, > > Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which > addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], > this series now make use of it. > > The pull request for ACPICA E.d related changes are already > raised and

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-11 Thread Eric Auger
Hi Shameer, On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > Hi, > > Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which > addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], > this series now make use of it. > > The pull request for ACPICA E.d related changes are already > raised a

RE: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-03 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
ieral...@arm.com; > j...@8bytes.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; w...@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang > ; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) > ; sami.muja...@arm.com; j...@solid-run.com; > eric.au...@redhat.com; yangyicong > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > On 21/02/

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-03-03 Thread Steven Price
On 21/02/2022 15:43, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > Hi, > > Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which > addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1], > this series now make use of it. > > The pull request for ACPICA E.d related changes are already > raised and can be