Hi Yi,
On 12/21/19 11:14 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi again,
On 2019/12/20 19:50, Liu, Yi L wrote:
3) Per VT-d spec, FLPT has canonical requirement to the input
addresses. So I'd suggest to add some enhance regards to it.
Please refer to chapter 3.6:-).
3.6 First-Level Translation
First-level trans
Hi again,
On 2019/12/20 19:50, Liu, Yi L wrote:
3) Per VT-d spec, FLPT has canonical requirement to the input
addresses. So I'd suggest to add some enhance regards to it.
Please refer to chapter 3.6:-).
3.6 First-Level Translation
First-level translation restricts the input-address to a canonic
Hi Yi,
Thanks for the comments.
On 12/20/19 7:50 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
Hi Baolu,
In a brief, this version is pretty good to me. However, I still want
to have the following checks to see if anything missed. Wish it
helps.
1) would using IOVA over FLPT default on?
My opinion is that before we ha
Hi Baolu,
In a brief, this version is pretty good to me. However, I still want
to have the following checks to see if anything missed. Wish it
helps.
1) would using IOVA over FLPT default on?
My opinion is that before we have got gIOVA nested translation
done for passthru devices, we should make