On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi Mark,
[adding David, since he's working on PCI/ITS stuff atm]
> The below is an attempt at an MSI binding, derived from my original
> example. It extends msi-parent inoto a phandle+(optional args) style
> property.
>
>
Hi Will,
The below is an attempt at an MSI binding, derived from my original
example. It extends msi-parent inoto a phandle+(optional args) style
property.
I haven't yet managed to come up with a sane way of describing
the Bus-ID/BDF -> {iommu,msi}-cells translation, but this should
hopefully cov
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:30:50PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Mark: how do you see this co-existing/merging with the current bindings?
> >
> > As I mentioned in my
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> > > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > It's possible to specify that the
any update on this?
On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:11 AM, Will Deacon
mailto:will.dea...@arm.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
On Ju
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> > > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > It's possible to specify that the
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > It's possible to specify that the paths exist. I expect that software
> > > would select which to use a
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> > On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > It's possible to specify that the paths exist. I expect that software
> > would select which to use at runtime.
> >
> My worry is how to define any priorities/preference
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:46:07PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>>
>>> On May 27, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:20:59PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
This is some thing we als
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:46:07PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>
> > On May 27, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:20:59PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> >> This is some thing we also like to see in ITS and SMMU drivers.
> >>> On Mar 24, 2
> On May 27, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:20:59PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>> This is some thing we also like to see in ITS and SMMU drivers.
>>> On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> For some devices, id
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:20:59PM +0100, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
> This is some thing we also like to see in ITS and SMMU drivers.
> > On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
> > their
This is some thing we also like to see in ITS and SMMU drivers.
> On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
> their operation (e.g. IOMMUs, MSI controllers). The identity of masters
> is determined from
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:30:00PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> >> The FSL LS2085A SoC has an actual RID->SID mapping table in the PCI
> >> controller, but it is not static in th
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
>> > their opera
Hi Stuart,
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
> > their operation (e.g. IOMMUs, MSI controllers). The identity of masters
>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
> their operation (e.g. IOMMUs, MSI controllers). The identity of masters
> is determined from sideband signals on the bus, and it may or may not be
> possible
Hi all,
For some devices, identification of particular masters is critical to
their operation (e.g. IOMMUs, MSI controllers). The identity of masters
is determined from sideband signals on the bus, and it may or may not be
possible to probe and/or configure this information. Worse still, these
inf
18 matches
Mail list logo
