On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:23:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> It can send plaintext packets that will be stored encrypted in memory.
> (Of course the hypervisor can do that too if it has access to the guest
> network).
And then what?
You need to find out where exactly (which pages) got the pac
On 09/05/2016 23:08, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 10:13 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/05/2016 20:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> And did the SEV implementation remember to encrypt the guest register
>>> state? Because, if not, everything of importance will leak out
>>> through th
On 05/09/2016 10:13 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2016 20:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> And did the SEV implementation remember to encrypt the guest register
>> state? Because, if not, everything of importance will leak out
>> through the VMCB and/or GPRs.
>
> No, it doesn't. And SEV
On 02/05/2016 20:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> And did the SEV implementation remember to encrypt the guest register
> state? Because, if not, everything of importance will leak out
> through the VMCB and/or GPRs.
No, it doesn't. And SEV is very limited unless you paravirtualize
everything.
Fo
On 04/30/2016 01:13 AM, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
>> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lendacky
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:56 PM
>> Sub
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 09:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lendacky
>> wrote:
>>> This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
>>> Encryption (SME) feature.
>>>
>>> SME can be used to mark in
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lendacky
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:56 PM
> Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD)
>
> This RFC patch se
On 04/27/2016 09:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
>> Encryption (SME) feature.
>>
>> SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
>> page tables.
On Wed 2016-04-27 16:39:51, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my
> > system?".
>
> Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from
> the 0th mail which you c
On Wed 2016-04-27 16:39:51, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my
> > system?".
>
> Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from
> the 0th mail which you c
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
> Encryption (SME) feature.
>
> SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
> page tables. A page of memory that is marked encrypted will be aut
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my
> system?".
Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from
the 0th mail which you could've found on your own:
"The following links provide additi
On 03/22/2016 08:00 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
>> Encryption (SME) feature.
>>
>> SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
>> page tables. A page of memory that is marked encrypted will be
On Wed 2016-04-27 16:05:20, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Why would I want SME on my system? My system seems to work without it.
>
> Your system doesn't have it and SME is default off.
That does not answer the question. "Why would I wan
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Why would I want SME on my system? My system seems to work without it.
Your system doesn't have it and SME is default off.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
_
Hi!
> This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
> Encryption (SME) feature.
>
> SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
> page tables. A page of memory that is marked encrypted will be automatically
> decrypted when read from DRAM and w
This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
Encryption (SME) feature.
SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
page tables. A page of memory that is marked encrypted will be automatically
decrypted when read from DRAM and will be automatica
This RFC patch series provides support for AMD's new Secure Memory
Encryption (SME) feature.
SME can be used to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted through the
page tables. A page of memory that is marked encrypted will be automatically
decrypted when read from DRAM and will be automatica
18 matches
Mail list logo
