On 23/05/17 08:50, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
[...]
For the next version of my SVM series, I was thinking of passing group
instead of device to iommu_bind. Since all devices in a group are expected
to share the same
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 28/04/17 10:04, Liu, Yi L wrote:
Hi Jean,
Sorry for the delay response. Still have some follow-up comments on
per-device or per-group. Pls refer to comments inline.
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jean-Phili
On 28/04/17 10:04, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> Hi Yi, Jacob,
>>
>> On 26/04/17 11:11, Liu, Yi L wrote:
>>> From: Jacob Pan
>>>
>>> Virtual IOMMU was proposed to support Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) use
>>> case in the guest:
>>> https
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Yi, Jacob,
>
> On 26/04/17 11:11, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > From: Jacob Pan
> >
> > Virtual IOMMU was proposed to support Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) use
> > case in the guest:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-deve
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 27/04/17 07:36, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >> Hi Yi, Jacob,
> >>
> >> On 26/04/17 11:11, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >>> From: Jacob Pan
> >>>
> >>> Virtual IOMMU w
