artlomiej Zolnierkiewicz ; David Airlie
>; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Christoph Hellwig
>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/32] drm: i915: fix common struct
>sg_table related issues
>
>On 2020-09-01 20:38, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
>
: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz ; David Airlie
; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Robin Murphy
; Christoph Hellwig ; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.infradead.org; Marek Szyprowski
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/32] drm: i915: fix common struct sg_table
related issues
The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
iewicz ; David Airlie
>; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Robin Murphy
>; Christoph Hellwig ; linux-arm-
>ker...@lists.infradead.org; Marek Szyprowski
>
>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/32] drm: i915: fix common struct sg_table
>related issues
>
>The Documentation
On 2020-08-26 07:32, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg() function
returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
dma_unmap_sg must be called with the or
The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg() function
returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of the entries
passed to the dma_
