On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> KyongHo Cho wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > please also get and inclue Acks from the Exynos maintainer for the next
>> > post.
>> > Since I have a compiling config for exynos now I w
KyongHo Cho wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please also get and inclue Acks from the Exynos maintainer for the next
> > post.
> > Since I have a compiling config for exynos now I will merge the patches
> > when you have the Acks and addressed
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:51:58PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> > This isn't really a problem. We allow destroying a domain with devices
> > attached. So this WARN_ON is not necessary.
> >
> BTW, Isn't it a problem when a device driver does not know that its
> iommu domain is destroyed?
> Can we reg
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please also get and inclue Acks from the Exynos maintainer for the next
> post.
> Since I have a compiling config for exynos now I will merge the patches
> when you have the Acks and addressed or explained the issues I pointed
> o
Hi,
please also get and inclue Acks from the Exynos maintainer for the next
post.
Since I have a compiling config for exynos now I will merge the patches
when you have the Acks and addressed or explained the issues I pointed
out below.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:26:08PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
