Hi Eric,
Thanks for the review, I somehow missed it, my apologies. See comments
below.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:28:37 +0100
Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On 10/24/19 9:55 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> > vIOMMU, we need to provide i
Hi Jacob,
On 10/24/19 9:55 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and driver
> level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific function to implement
> iommu passdown invalidate API for shared
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:52:01 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 12:11 AM
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:06:33 +
> > "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> >
> > > > >>> + /* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all P
> From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 12:11 AM
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:06:33 +
> "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
>
> > > >>> + /* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all PASIDs or single
> > > >>> PASID */
> > > >>> + {1, 1, 0},
> > > >>
> >
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:27:26 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 3:55 AM
> >
> > When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> > vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API a
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:06:33 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > >>> + /* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all PASIDs or single
> > >>> PASID */
> > >>> + {1, 1, 0},
> > >>
> > >> I forgot previous discussion. is it necessary to pass down dev
> > >> TLB invalidation
> > >> requests? Can it b
> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:03 PM
>
> Hi again,
>
> On 10/26/19 10:40 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/25/19 3:27 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >>> From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, October 25
Hi again,
On 10/26/19 10:40 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi,
On 10/25/19 3:27 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 3:55 AM
When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation sup
Hi,
On 10/25/19 3:27 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 3:55 AM
When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and
driver
level. This patch add
> From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 3:55 AM
>
> When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and
> driver
> level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific function to
When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and driver
level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific function to implement
iommu passdown invalidate API for shared virtual address.
The use case is for supporting caching
11 matches
Mail list logo
