On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 07:45:51PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 01/09/16 19:32, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:05:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> - while (--i >= 0)
> >> - __arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->smr_map, smrs[i].idx);
> >> - kfree(smrs);
> >> + while (i-
On 01/09/16 19:32, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:05:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> In order to consider SMR masking, we really want to be able to validate
>> ID/mask pairs against existing SMR contents to prevent stream match
>> conflicts, which at best would cause transaction
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:05:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> In order to consider SMR masking, we really want to be able to validate
> ID/mask pairs against existing SMR contents to prevent stream match
> conflicts, which at best would cause transactions to fault unexpectedly,
> and at worst lea
In order to consider SMR masking, we really want to be able to validate
ID/mask pairs against existing SMR contents to prevent stream match
conflicts, which at best would cause transactions to fault unexpectedly,
and at worst lead to silent unpredictable behaviour. With our SMMU
instance data holdi
