Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()

2019-07-18 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from > generic code. Christoph Hellwig mentioned that "There is no reason why we > should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why there > is a requirement

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()

2019-07-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:28:55AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from > generic code. Christoph Hellwig mentioned that "There is no reason why we > should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why ther

[PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()

2019-07-17 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from generic code. Christoph Hellwig mentioned that "There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA mask.", so just remove dma_check_mask().