Thanks for your answers.
I am now the sub-maintainer of vfio-platform. I will handle the rebase of
these serie and fix "[PATCH v3 0/6] vfio: type1: support for ARM SMMUS with
VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1". New versions are coming soon.
Regards,
Baptiste
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
On 26/02/15 17:02, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there
> anything keeping this series from getting merged upstream?
For a start, it looks like the dependency mentioned below is still not
in, which is a bit of a prob
Hi Baptiste,
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 18:02 +0100, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there anything
> keeping this series from getting merged upstream?
>
> Thanks,
> Baptiste
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Baptiste Reynal <
> b.
Hi everyone,
Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there anything
keeping this series from getting merged upstream?
Thanks,
Baptiste
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Baptiste Reynal <
b.rey...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:
> This patch series aims to implement VFIO support fo
This patch series aims to implement VFIO support for platform devices that
reside behind an IOMMU. Examples of such devices are devices behind an ARM
SMMU, or behind a Samsung Exynos System MMU.
The API used is based on the existing VFIO API that is also used with PCI
devices. Only devices that in