Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
some samsung topic stuff.
Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree, it
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
>>> 1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
>>> some
Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
some samsung topic stuff.
Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree, it
Hi KyongHo, Kukjin,
On 03/15/2012 08:09 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 03/15/12 04:12, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
KyongHo, I looked at 'Cho KyongHo ' and 'KyongHo Cho
' in this series, which one do you want to use?
Handling System MMUs with
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
> 1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
> some samsung topic stuff.
Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree, it is best to ca
Subash Patel wrote:
Hi KyongHo, Kukjin,
On 03/15/2012 08:09 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 03/15/12 04:12, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
KyongHo, I looked at 'Cho KyongHo ' and 'KyongHo Cho
' in this series, which one do you want to use?
Handlin
On 03/15/12 04:12, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
KyongHo, I looked at 'Cho KyongHo ' and 'KyongHo Cho
' in this series, which one do you want to use?
Handling System MMUs with an identifier is not flexible to manage
System MMU platform devi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Handling System MMUs with an identifier is not flexible to manage
> System MMU platform devices because of the following reasons:
> 1. A device driver which needs to handle System MMU must know the ID.
> 2. A System MMU may not present
Handling System MMUs with an identifier is not flexible to manage
System MMU platform devices because of the following reasons:
1. A device driver which needs to handle System MMU must know the ID.
2. A System MMU may not present in some implementations of Exynos family.
3. Handling System MMU with
