On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:10:47 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Cho,
>
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:37:45PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > I am preparing next patches to apply Alex Williamson's comment that
> > description of IOMMU's masters must be aligned with ARM SMMU.
> >
> > It is delayed due to
Hi Cho,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:37:45PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> I am preparing next patches to apply Alex Williamson's comment that
> description of IOMMU's masters must be aligned with ARM SMMU.
>
> It is delayed due to my jobs in the office.
>
> I will post the next patche series in two
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:42:24 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:52:12AM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > Patch summary:
> > [PATCH 01/20] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header
> > [PATCH 02/20] iommu/exynos: add missing cache flush for removed page table
> > entries
> > [PA
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:52:12AM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Patch summary:
> [PATCH 01/20] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header
> [PATCH 02/20] iommu/exynos: add missing cache flush for removed page table
> entries
> [PATCH 03/20] iommu/exynos: change error handling when page table updat
The current exynos-iommu(System MMU) driver does not work autonomously
since it is lack of support for power management of peripheral blocks.
For example, MFC device driver must ensure that its System MMU is disabled
before MFC block is power-down not to invalidate IOTLB in the System MMU
when I/O
