On 02/24/2016 11:10 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:54:48PM +, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
On 2/24/16, 3:32 AM, "Mark Rutland" wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0800, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
in Summary,
if i change asid-base to cavium,asid-base and
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:54:48PM +, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>
> On 2/24/16, 3:32 AM, "Mark Rutland" wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0800, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> >> in Summary,
> >>
> >> if i change asid-base to cavium,asid-base and still use DT for
> >> suppl
On 02/24/2016 05:38 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 23/02/16 23:56, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
On 02/23/2016 04:19 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 18/02/16 18:29, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VM
On 2/24/16, 3:32 AM, "Mark Rutland" wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0800, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>> in Summary,
>>
>> if i change asid-base to cavium,asid-base and still use DT for
>> supplying base value, is this a solution that will be accepted,
>
>No. The property is _
On 23/02/16 23:56, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
On 02/23/2016 04:19 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 18/02/16 18:29, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
namespaces; specifically within a given node
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0800, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> in Summary,
>
> if i change asid-base to cavium,asid-base and still use DT for
> supplying base value, is this a solution that will be accepted,
No. The property is _insufficient_, regardless of its name. This has
been poin
On 02/23/2016 04:19 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 18/02/16 18:29, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
as does SMMU2 and SMMU3.
On 02/23/2016 04:26 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:29:18AM -0800, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
as
in Summary,
if i change asid-base to cavium,asid-base and still use DT for supplying
base value, is this a solution that will be accepted, of course i will
do range check to see we are not supplying 16bit VMID for 8 bit systems
even though the property now indicates Cavium only.
Thanks,
Tiru
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:29:18AM -0800, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
> From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
>
> Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
> namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
> as does SMMU2 and SMMU3.
>
> This patch
On 18/02/16 18:29, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
as does SMMU2 and SMMU3.
This patch tries to address these issuee by su
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:29:18AM -0800, tchalama...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
> From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
>
> Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
> namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
> as does SMMU2 and SMMU3.
>
> This patch
From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Due to Errata#27704 CN88xx SMMUv2,supports only shared ASID and VMID
namespaces; specifically within a given node SMMU0 and SMMU1 share,
as does SMMU2 and SMMU3.
This patch tries to address these issuee by supplying asid and vmid
base from devicetree.
changes from V
13 matches
Mail list logo
