Joerg Roedel wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:54:18PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
>>
>> In reality, the spec can only support 16-bit PASID since
>> INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES and COMPLETE_PPR_REQUEST commands only allow
>> 16-bit PASID. So, we updat
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:54:18PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
>
> In reality, the spec can only support 16-bit PASID since
> INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES and COMPLETE_PPR_REQUEST commands only allow 16-bit
> PASID. So, we updated the PASID_MASK accordingly
Joerg,
Do you have any concerns about the V2 of this patch?
Thanks,
Suravee
On 3/5/2014 6:54 PM, suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote:
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
In reality, the spec can only support 16-bit PASID since
INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES and COMPLETE_PPR_REQUEST commands only allow 16-b
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
In reality, the spec can only support 16-bit PASID since
INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES and COMPLETE_PPR_REQUEST commands only allow 16-bit
PASID. So, we updated the PASID_MASK accordingly and invoke BUG_ON
if the hardware is reporting PASmax more than 16-bit.
Besides, max PA
