On 08/04/17 00:13, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/07/17 07:46, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 06/04/17 20:34, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 04/06/17 04:01, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Size of the dma-r
On 04/07/17 07:46, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/17 20:34, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 04/06/17 04:01, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
>>> On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
On 04/06/17 00:01, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
>> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
>> the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
>> resulting in size get
On 06/04/17 20:34, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/06/17 04:01, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It o
Hi Frank,
On 4/7/2017 1:04 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 04/06/17 04:01, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflo
On 04/06/17 04:01, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
>>> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
>>> the coherent_dma_mask is set
On 04/06/17 03:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/17 08:01, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
>>> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
>>> the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits
On 06/04/17 14:56, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 06/04/17 08:01, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overfl
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/17 08:01, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
>>> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
>>> the coherent_dma_mask is set fo
Hi Frank,
On 4/6/2017 12:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
resulting in size
On 06/04/17 08:01, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
>> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
>> the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
>> resulting in size get
On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote:
> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
> the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
> resulting in size getting passed as 0 wrongly. Fix this by
> passs
On 04/04/17 11:18, Sricharan R wrote:
> Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
> and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
> the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
> resulting in size getting passed as 0 wrongly. Fix this by
> passs
Size of the dma-range is calculated as coherent_dma_mask + 1
and passed to arch_setup_dma_ops further. It overflows when
the coherent_dma_mask is set for full 64 bits 0x,
resulting in size getting passed as 0 wrongly. Fix this by
passsing in max(mask, mask + 1). Note that in this ca
14 matches
Mail list logo