On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:56:00AM -0500, Jay Cornwall wrote:
> On 2015-10-14 04:10, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >Hi Jay,
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:52:43AM -0500, Jay Cornwall wrote:
> >>handle_mm_fault indirectly triggers a BUG in do_numa_page when given
> >>a VMA without read/write/execute acce
On 2015-10-14 04:10, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Jay,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:52:43AM -0500, Jay Cornwall wrote:
handle_mm_fault indirectly triggers a BUG in do_numa_page when given
a VMA without read/write/execute access. Check this condition in
do_fault.
do_fault -> handle_mm_fault -> handle
Hi Jay,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:52:43AM -0500, Jay Cornwall wrote:
> handle_mm_fault indirectly triggers a BUG in do_numa_page when given
> a VMA without read/write/execute access. Check this condition in do_fault.
>
> do_fault -> handle_mm_fault -> handle_pte_fault -> do_numa_page
>
> mm/m
handle_mm_fault indirectly triggers a BUG in do_numa_page when given
a VMA without read/write/execute access. Check this condition in do_fault.
do_fault -> handle_mm_fault -> handle_pte_fault -> do_numa_page
mm/memory.c
3147 static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_st...
