On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:42:16PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> For sure - although I am now wondering whether "mapped" is perhaps a little
> ambiguous in the naming, since the answer to "can I use the API" is yes even
> when the device may currently be attached to an identity/passthrough domain
>
On 06/12/2018 15:35, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Robin,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:17:54PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
FWIW, this check (and its ACPI equivalent in patch #3) is specifically
asking "has .add_device() already been called?", rather than the more
general "is this device managed by an IOM
Hi Robin,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:17:54PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> FWIW, this check (and its ACPI equivalent in patch #3) is specifically
> asking "has .add_device() already been called?", rather than the more
> general "is this device managed by an IOMMU?" (to which the exact answer at
> t
On 04/12/2018 17:25, Joerg Roedel wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel
Use Use device_iommu_mapped() to check if the device is
already mapped by an IOMMU.
FWIW, this check (and its ACPI equivalent in patch #3) is specifically
asking "has .add_device() already been called?", rather than the more
genera
From: Joerg Roedel
Use Use device_iommu_mapped() to check if the device is
already mapped by an IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index c5dd6307
