Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Add dummy implementations for !IOMMU_IOVA

2017-03-22 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Thierry > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:14:31PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > I've got a series of patches that I'd like to merge for v4.12 that have > > a build-time dependency on this patch. It would therefore be great to > > g

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Add dummy implementations for !IOMMU_IOVA

2017-03-22 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi Thierry On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:14:31PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > I've got a series of patches that I'd like to merge for v4.12 that have > a build-time dependency on this patch. It would therefore be great to > get your Acked-by on this so that I can merge it through the DRM tree > wit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Add dummy implementations for !IOMMU_IOVA

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:11:28PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > Currently, building code which uses the API guarded by the IOMMU_IOVA > will fail to link if IOMMU_IOVA is not enabled. Often this code will be > using the API provided by the IOMMU_API Kconfig symbol, but

[PATCH 2/2] iommu: Add dummy implementations for !IOMMU_IOVA

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
From: Thierry Reding Currently, building code which uses the API guarded by the IOMMU_IOVA will fail to link if IOMMU_IOVA is not enabled. Often this code will be using the API provided by the IOMMU_API Kconfig symbol, but support for this can be optional, with code falling back to contiguous mem