If there are multiple NUMA domains but the RHSA is missing in ACPI/DMAR
table, we could default to the device NUMA domain as fall back.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
Cc: Jacob Pan
Cc: Kevin Tian
Cc: Ashok Raj
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200904010303.2961-1-baolu...@lin
Hi Kevin,
Thanks a lot for looking at my patch.
On 8/28/20 10:13 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 1:57 PM
If there are multiple NUMA domains but the RHSA is missing in ACPI/DMAR
table, we could default to the device NUMA domain as fall back. This also
bene
> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 1:57 PM
>
> If there are multiple NUMA domains but the RHSA is missing in ACPI/DMAR
> table, we could default to the device NUMA domain as fall back. This also
> benefits the vIOMMU use case where only a single vIOMMU is exposed,
> hence
> no RHS
If there are multiple NUMA domains but the RHSA is missing in ACPI/DMAR
table, we could default to the device NUMA domain as fall back. This also
benefits the vIOMMU use case where only a single vIOMMU is exposed, hence
no RHSA will be present but device numa domain can be correct.
Cc: Jacob Pan
