Hi Chritoph,
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:10 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> There is no guarantee to CMA's placement, so allocating a zone specific
> atomic pool from CMA might return memory from a completely different
> memory zone. To get around this double check CMA's placement before
> all
Hi,
I have merged this to a 5.8 tree along with "dma-pool: Fix atomic pool
selection" and tested it in various ACPI/DT combinations, particularly
on the RPI4. It seems to be working fine.
So thanks for your time and effort clearing this up!
tested-by: Jeremy Linton
On 7/10/20 9:10 AM, N
There is no guarantee to CMA's placement, so allocating a zone specific
atomic pool from CMA might return memory from a completely different
memory zone. To get around this double check CMA's placement before
allocating from it.
Fixes: c84dc6e68a1d ("dma-pool: add additional coherent pools to map
