Hi Laurent,
On 7/14/2014 6:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2014 09:19:23 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
>> On 7/10/2014 7:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 July 2014 09:03:26 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
>>>> On 5/15/2014 7:40 PM, Laurent Pinchart wr
Hi Laurent,
On 7/10/2014 7:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 09:03:26 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
>> On 5/15/2014 7:40 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Cache the micro-TLB number in archdata allocated in the .add_device
>>> handler instead of lookin
mmu;
> + archdata->utlb = utlb;
[snip]
I have one question for ipmmu_add_device().
In my understanding, your code will find utlb for device
base on device name.
For any device, it will /only/ return utlb number of first match.
How about the case that a device name connected with more
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your explanation.
I'm fine with current situation.
I have also checked other drivers and they did the same.
As you said, let's improve this driver when the time comes.
Thanks.
Best regards,
KHIEM Nguyen
On 6/4/2014 2:39 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
&g
_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
In this case, if error occurs, -EBUSY is returned.
It's easier for troubleshooting the issue.
How do you think ?
Best regards,
KHIEM Nguyen
On 4/2/2014 7:47 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinc
