On 02/06/16 16:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Split out subsystem specific changes for easier reviews. This will be
> squashed with main commit.
Acked-by: David Vrabel
David
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
On 17/11/14 14:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am writing this email to ask for your advice.
>
> On architectures where dma addresses are different from physical
> addresses, it can be difficult to retrieve the physical address of a
> page from its dma address.
>
> Specifically this i
On 11/09/14 02:22, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/9/10 20:36, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
>>> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x8
On 09/09/14 03:06, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/9/5 22:29, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>> Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure
>>> MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
>
reparation for using struct
> msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms.
Acked-by: David Vrabel
But I wonder if it would be better the Xen subsystem to provide its own
struct irq_chip instead of adjusting the fields in the generic x86 one.
David
___
On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure
> MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
[...]
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
[...]
> @@ -418,9 +430,9 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void)
>
On 12/08/14 08:25, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86.
> Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. This patch
> reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and add #ifdef for x86
