On 19 Feb 2021 12:24, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > As of today, the proposal has been approved for inclusion in the next
> > release of the ACPI spec (whatever version gets released post the 6.4
> > versi
On 17 Feb 2021 10:37, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:31:03PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > Would you believe last week's meeting was canceled, too? Not sure
> > why the chair/co-chair are doing this but I'm finding it a little
> > frustrating
On 04 Feb 2021 13:25, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > Hi Al,
> > > >
> > > > On
On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > Hi Al,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote
On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf
> > > You can incorporate it into the ASWG proposal.
> > > C
On 04 Dec 2020 19:09, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:01:27PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > On 03 Dec 2020 22:21, Yinghan Yang wrote:
> > > Hi Jean,
> > >
> > > I'm sorry for the delayed response. I think the new
> Segment end], and if its BDF is in [BPF start, BDF end]. Its endpoint ID will
> be:
>
> ((Segment - Segment start) << 16) + BDF - BDF start + Endpoint start
>
> Does that sound OK?
>
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
--
ciao,
al
-
On 04 Nov 2020 10:33, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:09:04PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > So, there are some questions about the VIOT definition and I just
> > don't know enough to be able to answer them. One of the ASWG members
>
On 06 Oct 2020 17:23, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hello Al,
>
> On 10/2/20 8:23 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> > On 24 Sep 2020 11:54, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Adding Al in the loop
> >>
> >> On 9/24/20 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
nition of
the table changing is pretty low, and that it has been thought out
pretty well already. ASWG's consideration will therefore start
from the assumption that it would be best _not_ to make changes.
So, I'll let you know what happens next week.
>
> >
> > Not that I kno
6.4 which is mostly done now -- very, very slim, but stranger
things have happened. Most likely, once approved it would be in
ACPI 6.5, sometime in 2021. I'll post the link to the submittal
as soon as I can.
Again, my apologies for the delays; approval in the spec can procee
11 matches
Mail list logo
