On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:12 AM James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 10:43 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Linux should not use TPM2_PCR_Extend *at all*. Instead, Linux should
> > exclusively use TPM2_PCR_Event. I would expect that passing, say,
> > the entire kernel image to TPM2
On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 10:43 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Linux should not use TPM2_PCR_Extend *at all*. Instead, Linux should
> exclusively use TPM2_PCR_Event. I would expect that passing, say,
> the entire kernel image to TPM2_PCR_Event would be a big mistake, so
> instead Linux should hash t
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:43 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Linux should not use TPM2_PCR_Extend *at all*. Instead, Linux should
> exclusively use TPM2_PCR_Event. I would expect that passing, say, the
> entire kernel image to TPM2_PCR_Event would be a big mistake, so
> instead Linux should hash
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 5:17 PM Daniel P. Smith
wrote:
>
> On 11/2/24 12:04, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-11-02 at 10:53 -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> >> Hi Luto,
> >>
> >> My apologies, I missed this response and the active on v11 cause me
> >> to
> >> get an inquiry why I hadn't res
