On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 08:17:05PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Ross et al, can you confirm that your code actually, at least by
> default and with a monstrous warning to anyone who tries to change the
> default, caps SHA1 PCRs if SHA256 is available? And then can we maybe
> all stop hassling
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:10 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15 2024 at 13:38, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> > On 5/31/24 09:54, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Eric Biggers writes:
> >>> That paragraph is also phrased as a hypothetical, "Even if we'd prefer to
> >>> use
> >>> SHA-256-only".
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 01:14:45PM -0700, ross.philip...@oracle.com wrote:
> On 8/27/24 11:14 AM, 'Eric Biggers' via trenchboot-devel wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 07:16:56PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 06:03:18PM -0700, Ross Philipson wrote:
> > > > From: "Daniel
-misc/char-misc-linus herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master
efi/next linus/master v6.11-rc5]
[cannot apply to herbert-crypto-2.6/master next-20240828]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documente
On 8/27/24 11:14 AM, 'Eric Biggers' via trenchboot-devel wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 07:16:56PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 06:03:18PM -0700, Ross Philipson wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Smith"
For better or worse, Secure Launch needs SHA-1 and SHA-256. The
choice of hashe
ar-misc-linus
> herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master efi/next linus/master v6.11-rc5]
> [cannot apply to herbert-crypto-2.6/master next-20240828]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as docum
herbert-crypto-2.6/master next-20240828]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab
