On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:37:20PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> I'll rely on Christoph to determine whether it makes sense to add some
> periodic scavening of the atomic pools, whether that's needed for this to
> be merged, or wheter we should enforce some maximum pool size.
I don't really see
> + /*
> + * Unencrypted memory must come directly from DMA atomic pools if
> + * blocking is not allowed.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT_POOL) &&
> + force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && !gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
> + ret = dma_alloc_from_po
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 02:21:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 The Linux Foundation
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
Of the old copyrights the L
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:21:27PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > Good points, I'll post revised version when you post your v3 of this.
>
>
>
> Any plans on posting v3 of this? Thanks,
Just back from a long weekend. I'll take a stab at it soon.
_
On 07/04/2020 20:12, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 07/04/2020 03:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:25:09PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Do you see any serious problem with this approach? Thanks!
Do you have a link to the whole branch? The
Hi Alex,
Thanks a lot for the feedback, my comments inline.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:21:29 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:41:57 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just a gentle reminder, any feedback on the options I listed below?
> > New ideas will be even be
> From: Alex Williamson
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:29 AM
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:40:58 +
> "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
>
> > > From: Alex Williamson
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:21 AM
> > >
> > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:05:33 +
> > > "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Fr
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:40:58 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Alex Williamson
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:21 AM
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:05:33 +
> > "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Tian, Kevin
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:55 PM
> > > >
> > > > > From
> From: Alex Williamson
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:21 AM
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:05:33 +
> "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
>
> > > From: Tian, Kevin
> > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:55 PM
> > >
> > > > From: Raj, Ashok
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:11 AM
> > > >
> > > > On Wed
> On Apr 8, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> Hi Qian,
>
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>> After further testing, the change along is insufficient. What I am chasing
>> right
>> now is the swap device will go offline after heavy memory pressure below. The
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:48 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan
wrote:
>
> From: Jordan Crouse
>
> Some client devices want to directly map the IOMMU themselves instead
> of using the DMA domain. Allow those devices to opt in to direct
> mapping by way of a list of compatible strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorda
Hi Hadar,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on stm32/stm32-next]
[also build test ERROR on sunxi/sunxi/for-next tegra/for-next linus/master
v5.7-rc1 next-20200413]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the
Hi Hadar,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on stm32/stm32-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.7-rc1 next-20200413]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use
Hi Hadar,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on stm32/stm32-next]
[also build test ERROR on sunxi/sunxi/for-next tegra/for-next linus/master
v5.7-rc1 next-20200413]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:41:57 -0700
Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a gentle reminder, any feedback on the options I listed below? New
> ideas will be even better.
>
> Christoph, does the explanation make sense to you? We do have the
> capability/flag based scheme for IOMMU API extension, th
Hi Joerg,
On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 20:37 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel
>
> When a bus is initialized with iommu-ops, all devices on the bus are
> scanned and iommu-groups are allocated for them, and each groups will
> also get a default domain allocated.
>
> Until now this happen
Hi Jean,
Sorry for the delay, I have to do some research based on your feedback.
I also plan to document this in the next version.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:01:46 +0200
Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:33:53AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 202
Hi All,
Just a gentle reminder, any feedback on the options I listed below? New
ideas will be even better.
Christoph, does the explanation make sense to you? We do have the
capability/flag based scheme for IOMMU API extension, the version is
mainly used for size lookup. Compatibility checking is
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 03:25:03PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> cc Johannes who suggested this API call originally
I forgot why we did it this way - probably just cruft begetting more
cruft. Either way, Christoph's cleanup makes this look a lot better.
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:03 AM Christop
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:35:33 +0200
Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:19:40AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:00:21 -0700
> > "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex
> > >
> > > + Bjorn
> >
> > + Don
> >
> > > FWIW I can't understand why PCI
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:05:33 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Tian, Kevin
> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:55 PM
> >
> > > From: Raj, Ashok
> > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:11 AM
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:19:40AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 7 Apr 20
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:29:31 -0700
"Raj, Ashok" wrote:
> Hi Alex
>
> Going through the PCIe Spec, there seems a lot of such capabilities
> that are different between PF and VF. Some that make sense
> and some don't.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 08:10:43PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> >
> > >
On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 11:50 +0800, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Thanks for picking this up. Apologies for my absence here - I wasn't
> able to work on this recently, but I'm back again now.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:32 AM Jon Derrick
> wrote:
> > This becomes problematic if the real DM
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 10:48 +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 2020/4/13 10:25, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:22 AM Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > This is caused by the fragile private domain implementation. We are in
> > > process of removing it by enhancing the iommu subsyste
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:31:24PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:12:17PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > Hello Robin, Will
> >
> > On 2020-01-22 17:18, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > > This series allows drm devices to set a default identity
> > > mapping using i
Both of_platform.h and of_device.h were included each other.
In of_device.h, removed unneeded #include to of_platform.h
and added include to of_platform.h in the files that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Hadar Gat
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
drivers/bus/vexpress-config
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> index 237e36a280cb..ec57d215086a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> @@ -16,6 +16
Convert Renesas VMSA-Compatible IOMMU bindings documentation
to json-schema.
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda
---
.../bindings/iommu/renesas,ipmmu-vmsa.txt | 73 --
.../bindings/iommu/renesas,ipmmu-vmsa.yaml | 90 ++
2 files changed, 90 insert
> From: Tian, Kevin
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:55 PM
>
> > From: Raj, Ashok
> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:11 AM
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:19:40AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:00:21 -0700
> > > "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex
> > > >
> >
> From: Raj, Ashok
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:11 AM
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:19:40AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:00:21 -0700
> > "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex
> > >
> > > + Bjorn
> >
> > + Don
> >
> > > FWIW I can't understand why PCI SIG went di
30 matches
Mail list logo
