On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:05:04PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael S. Tsirkin writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:13:41PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wro
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:42 +0200
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
> array based interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Steven Rostedt
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware)
-- Steve
___
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:43 +0200
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Simplify the stack retrieval code by using the storage array based
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware)
-- Steve
___
iommu mailing list
iom
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:07:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:32:30AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > > +typedef bool (*stack_trace_consume
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:02:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:42:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > > Another idea I had (but never got a chance to work on) was to extend the
> > > x86 unwind interface to all arche
On 2019/4/17 9:39, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/4/16 17:14, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:31:47AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>> On 2019/4/4 23:30, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:12:41PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v1 --> v2:
>
Hi Robin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Murphy
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 4:51 PM
>
> On 29/03/2019 14:00, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Laurentiu Tudor
> >
> > Add a one-to-one iommu mapping for bman private data memory (FBPR).
> > This is required for BMAN to work
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:41 +0200
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> It's only used in trace.c and there is absolutely no point in compiling it
> in when user space stack traces are not supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Steven Rostedt
Funny, these were moved out to global functions a
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:41:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> From a very high level POV this looks ok, but sometimes a bit to
>> convoluted to me. The major issue why I went with the version I posted
>> is that I can cleanly ifdef out the remap code in just a few sections.
>> In this version
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:32:30AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > +typedef bool (*stack_trace_consume_fn)(void *cookie, unsigned long addr,
> > > +
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > +typedef bool (*stack_trace_consume_fn)(void *cookie, unsigned long addr,
> > + bool reliable);
>
> > +void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:15:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Still, I've worked in the vm_map_pages() stuff pending in MM and given them
> the same treatment to finish the picture. Both x86_64_defconfig and
> i386_defconfig do indeed compile and link fine as I expected, so I really
> would li
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +typedef bool (*stack_trace_consume_fn)(void *cookie, unsigned long addr,
> + bool reliable);
> +void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
> + st
Please fix up the > 80 char line. Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:42:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Another idea I had (but never got a chance to work on) was to extend the
> > x86 unwind interface to all arches. So instead of the callbacks, each
> > arch would implement something l
15 matches
Mail list logo