Hi Jean,
On Mon Oct 23, 2017 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> This is version 0.5 of the virtio-iommu specification, the paravirtualized
> IOMMU. This version addresses feedback from v0.4 and adds an event virtqueue.
> Please find the specification, LaTeX sources and pdf, at:
>
Further to this I have verified that IOMMU is working fine, traces and
additional printk's added to the kernel module were used to check. All
accesses are successful and hit the correct addresses.
However profiling under Windows shows there might be an issue with IRQs
not reaching the guest. When
Hi,
I realize this is an older thread but I have spent much of today trying
to
diagnose the problem.
I have discovered how to reliably reproduce the problem with very little
effort.
It seems that reproducing the issue has been hit and miss for people as
it seems
to primarily affect games/pr
Hi, Sakari,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sakari Ailus
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 4:15 AM
> To: Zhi, Yong
> Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com; Zheng, Jian
> Xu ; M
Hi, Sakari,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sakari Ailus
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 2:10 AM
> To: Zhi, Yong
> Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com; Zheng, Jian
> Xu ; M
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 04:54:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:58 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:53:11PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jer
Hi Jordan,
[Lots of IOMMU people have been dropped from Cc, I've tried to add them back]
On 12/10/17 16:28, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:55:32PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> On 12/10/17 13:05, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> [...]
>> * An iommu_process can be bound to mul
On 23/10/17 12:04, Liu, Yi L wrote:
>> +idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
>> +spin_lock(&iommu_process_lock);
>> +pasid = idr_alloc_cyclic(&iommu_process_idr, process, domain->min_pasid,
>> + domain->max_pasid + 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +process->pasid = pasid;
>
> [Li
Hi Jean,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:31 PM
> To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; iommu@lists.linux-
>
This is version 0.5 of the virtio-iommu specification, the paravirtualized
IOMMU. This version addresses feedback from v0.4 and adds an event virtqueue.
Please find the specification, LaTeX sources and pdf, at:
git://linux-arm.org/virtio-iommu.git viommu/v0.5
http://linux-arm.org/git?p=virtio-iommu
From: Jim Quinlan
> Sent: 20 October 2017 16:28
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> >> I am not sure I understand your comment -- the size of the request
> >> shouldn't be a factor. Let's look at your exam
11 matches
Mail list logo
